atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / OOD and anomaly detection

MultiOOD: Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Multiple Modalities

NeurIPS 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › OOD and anomaly detection · approach: Provable and feature-based OOD detection

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces MultiOOD, a multimodal (video, optical flow, audio) OOD detection benchmark built from five action recognition datasets, plus the A2D modality-discrepancy training loss and NP-Mix outlier synthesis that improve existing unimodal OOD scores.

Problem

Out-of-distribution detection has been studied almost only for unimodal image inputs, and no benchmark existed for multimodal OOD detection across varied dataset sizes and modality combinations.

Approach

Observes that softmax predictions from different modalities agree on ID data but diverge on OOD data (Modality Prediction Discrepancy); A2D trains modalities to agree on the ground-truth class and disagree on the remaining classes via a Hellinger-distance loss, and NP-Mix synthesizes outliers by mixing prototypes of nearest-neighbor classes.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add A2D training and NP-Mix to ASHASH · UCF101 50/51 Near-OODFPR95: 32.14 -> 10.68Helped
Add A2D training and NP-Mix to VIMVIM · HMDB51 Far-OOD (average)FPR95: 16.73 -> 11.77Helped
Add A2D training and NP-Mix to GENGEN · Kinetics-600 Far-OOD (average)AUROC: 80.30 -> 82.67Helped
Use L1, L2, or Wasserstein instead of Hellinger distance in A2D (ablation)A2D with Energy · HMDB51 25/26 Near-OODAUROC: Baseline 87.46; L1 88.52; L2 88.84; Wasserstein 88.61; Hellinger 88.91Mixed
Replace NP-Mix with VOS (ablation)A2D with Energy · HMDB51 25/26 Near-OODAUROC: 87.46 -> 87.94Helped
Replace NP-Mix with NPOS (ablation)A2D with Energy · HMDB51 25/26 Near-OODAUROC: 87.46 -> 87.59Helped
Replace NP-Mix with Mixup (ablation)A2D with Energy · HMDB51 25/26 Near-OODAUROC: 87.46 -> 87.77Helped
Use NP-Mix rather than VOS, NPOS, or Mixup (ablation)A2D with Energy · HMDB51 25/26 Near-OODAUROC: VOS 87.94; NPOS 87.59; Mixup 87.77; NP-Mix 88.91Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: EPIC-Kitchens HAC HMDB51 UCF101 Kinetics-600 Kinetics-400 VGGSound

Benchmarks: MultiOOD Near-OOD (HMDB51 25/26, UCF101 50/51, EPIC-Kitchens 4/4, Kinetics-600 129/100) MultiOOD Far-OOD (HMDB51 and Kinetics-600 as ID)

Metrics: FPR95 AUROC ID ACC

Baselines: MSP Energy MaxLogit Mahalanobis ReAct ASH GEN KNN VIM LogitNorm VOS NPOS

Builds on: Energy NPOS VOS LogitNorm Generalized Entropy

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy