atlas

Research map / Large language models / Agents, code and math

Hierarchically Encapsulated Representation for Protocol Design in Self-Driving Labs

ICLR 2025 · Large language models › Agents, code and math · approach: LLMs for scientific discovery · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a hierarchically encapsulated, DSL-based representation (instance actions, operation interfaces, product-flow units) auto-generated from protocol corpora via non-parametric Bayesian modeling, which LLM designers use to plan, modify and adjust experimental protocols.

Problem

LLMs fail to fully elicit protocol design capability for self-driving laboratories, producing protocols that mirror existing ones and losing configuration details, because experimental knowledge is flat and unorganized.

Approach

A multi-faceted, multi-scale representation with three levels (instance actions with attributes, operation-centric function abstraction, product-flow-centric model abstraction) encapsulated as DSLs, with the dual operation/product-flow views enabling reciprocal verification; the abstractions are learned automatically from domain protocol corpora using a DPMM with Gaussian process value modeling.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add product-flow view to the operation-centric DSL with external verification (ablation)EE · Protocol design, all tasks and domainsSix-dimensional consistency scores: t(278)=8.007, p<.0001Helped
Add product-flow view to the operation-centric DSL with internal prompting (ablation)EI · Protocol design, all tasks and domainsSix-dimensional consistency scores: t(278)=8.397, p<.0001Helped
Use dual-view DSL rather than instance-action prompting (ablation)Protocol design · Protocol design, all tasks and domainsSix-dimensional consistency scores: t(278)=24.493, p<.0001Helped
Use operation-centric representation rather than instance-action representation (ablation)Internal-prompt designer · Protocol design, all tasks and domainsSix-dimensional consistency scores: t(278)=15.259, p<.0001Helped
Use instance-action prompting rather than retrieval on original protocols (ablation)Protocol design · Protocol design, all tasks and domainsSix-dimensional consistency scores: t(278)=8.340, p<.0001Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: domain-specific corpora of protocols from top journals (Genetics, Medical, Bioengineering, Ecology)

Benchmarks: protocol design testing set (planning, modification, adjustment tasks)

Metrics: IoU(Op) IoU(Prod) IoU(Dev) Sim(Exec) Sim(Goal) Sim(Param)

Baselines: Flatten-Baseline (RAG over NL protocols) Instance-Baseline Instance-Internal (ISA prompting) Encapsulated-Internal Encapsulated-External

Builds on: retrieval-augmented generation chain-of-thought

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy