atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Test-time adaptation

Test-Time Adaptation for Combating Missing Modalities in Egocentric Videos

ICLR 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Test-time adaptation · approach: Test-time adaptation of vision-language models · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MiDl, a test-time adaptation method that makes a pretrained audio-visual model robust to missing modalities on unlabeled egocentric video by combining a mutual-information invariance loss with a self-distillation (KL) loss to the unadapted predictions.

Problem

Multimodal egocentric video models degrade sharply when audio or video modalities are missing at test time, and existing remedies typically require retraining or labeled data.

Approach

Adapt a pretrained multimodal model online and unsupervised at test time: minimize mutual information between predictions and modality-source combinations (invariance) while keeping predictions under full modality close to the original model via KL self-distillation, so performance is preserved when modalities are complete.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply MiDl test-time adaptationMBT · Epic-Sounds, 1-p_AV=25, 50, 75accuracy: 45.6 -> 46.8; 37.1 -> 38.8; 28.3 -> 29.8Helped
Apply MiDl test-time adaptationMBT · Epic-Kitchens, 1-p_AV=25, 50, 75accuracy: 55.5 -> 58.4; 46.8 -> 52.4; 37.9 -> 46.4Helped
Apply MiDl test-time adaptationMBT · Epic-Sounds, 1-p_AV=0accuracy: 55.1 -> 55.0Hurt
Apply MiDl test-time adaptationMBT · Epic-Kitchens, 1-p_AV=0accuracy: 63.9 -> 63.7Hurt
Apply MiDl test-time adaptationMBT · Epic-Sounds, 1-p_AV=100accuracy: 19.5 -> 19.5No clear effect
Apply MiDl test-time adaptationMBT · Epic-Kitchens, 1-p_AV=100accuracy: 29.5 -> 29.5No clear effect
Apply KL loss to each modality prediction in addition to audiovisual predictions (ablation)MiDl · Epic-Soundsaccuracy: 46.8 -> 46.8; 38.8 -> 38.9; 29.8 -> 30.0No clear effect
Apply KL loss to each modality prediction in addition to audiovisual predictions (ablation)MiDl · Epic-Kitchensaccuracy: 58.4 -> 57.9; 52.4 -> 52.1; 46.4 -> 46.4No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Epic-Kitchens Epic-Sounds

Benchmarks: Epic-Kitchens Epic-Sounds

Metrics: accuracy

Baselines: MBT without adaptation unimodal model KL on each modality variant

Builds on: MBT (multimodal bottleneck transformer)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy