atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Learnable Burst-Encodable Time-of-Flight Imaging for High-Fidelity Long-Distance Depth Sensing

NeurIPS 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Differentiable optimization layers

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Burst-Encodable ToF (BE-ToF), a burst-mode single-frequency iToF paradigm with an end-to-end learned binarized coding function and a Restormer-based network (RSCF-Net), validated on simulated NYU-V2 and a outdoor prototype.

Problem

Indirect ToF imaging suffers from phase wrapping and low SNR at long distances, while direct ToF needs ultra-short pulses and high-resolution TDCs; existing fixes need multi-frequency modulation or scene priors.

Approach

Emit burst-mode light pulses so the phase shift spans the full 0-2π within one long burst period, avoiding phase wrapping with single-frequency modulation; jointly learn binarized coding functions (constrained by a double-well loss and first-order difference loss) and a Restormer-based depth reconstruction network, with a Fisher-information guidance loss.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use BE-ToF instead of the strongest listed baselineDepth sensing method · 0-3mMAE (mm): 7.19 -> 5.90 (H_snr); 10.46 -> 6.95 (M_snr); 16.91 -> 12.71 (L_snr)Helped
use BE-ToF instead of the strongest listed baselineDepth sensing method · 30-33mMAE (mm): 20.80 -> 8.03 (H_snr); 24.54 -> 12.25 (M_snr); 31.61 -> 18.29 (L_snr)Helped
use BE-ToF instead of the strongest listed baselineDepth sensing method · 60-63mMAE (mm): 31.50 -> 11.93 (H_snr); 35.02 -> 16.60 (M_snr); 45.54 -> 26.08 (L_snr)Helped
use BE-ToF instead of the strongest listed baselineDepth sensing method · 90-93mMAE (mm): 42.64 -> 18.96 (H_snr); 45.12 -> 21.99 (M_snr); 56.97 -> 29.58 (L_snr)Helped
use learnable coding functions instead of square coding (ablation)BE-ToF with RSCF-Net · 0-3m, H_snrMAE (mm): 12.66 -> 5.90Helped
use RSCF-Net instead of DeepToF (ablation)BE-ToF with learned coding functions · 0-3m, H_snrMAE (mm): 14.76 -> 5.90Helped
add Fisher guidance loss (ablation)BE-ToF learnable framework · Synthetic assessment, different distances and SNRsMAE (mm)Helped
add double well loss (ablation)BE-ToF learnable coding functions · Coding-function hardware implementabilityhardware implementabilityHelped
add first-order difference loss (ablation)BE-ToF learnable coding functions · Coding-function hardware implementabilityhardware implementabilityHelped
add CFEB (ablation)RSCF-Net · Synthetic assessment, different distances and SNRsMAE (mm)Helped
add MFFB (ablation)RSCF-Net · Synthetic assessment, different distances and SNRsMAE (mm)Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NYU-V2

Benchmarks: NYU-V2 simulated ToF at 0-3m, 30-33m, 60-63m, 90-93m

Metrics: MAE (mm)

Baselines: Sine+PS Square+PS DeepToF FisherToF MaskToF

Builds on: Restormer FisherToF DeepToF MaskToF Efficient Channel Attention

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy