atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / MDPs and planning

Faster Fixed-Point Methods for Multichain MDPs

NeurIPS 2025 · Reinforcement learning › MDPs and planning · approach: Average-reward and regularized MDPs · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Develops faster value-iteration methods for general (multichain) average-reward MDPs by combining a shifted Halpern iteration with a gain-estimation phase and discounted VI with sublinear value-error reduction, achieving rates in terms of a sharper gain-dropping time parameter.

Problem

Solving general (multichain) average-reward MDPs with value iteration nonasymptotically, where the optimal policy must solve a navigation subproblem (reaching the best recurrent class) as well as the recurrent optimization problem; prior bounds degrade with large complexity parameters like B and 1/D

Approach

Introduces the gain-dropping time parameter T_drop as a sharper complexity measure, shows restricted commutativity of the Bellman operator with the optimal gain, and designs an approximately shifted Halpern iteration (gain estimate from Picard steps then Halpern) plus an average-to-discounted reduction with a warm-start discounted VI, yielding O(1/n) rates independent of 1/Delta.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use gain-dropping time \Tdrop in the policy-suboptimality bound instead of the prior bound's transient-time parameter \mathsf{B}Approximately Shifted Halpern Iteration versus discounted reduction prior work · General multichain average-reward MDPspolicy suboptimality: O(\frac{\Tdrop + 1}{n} \tinfnorm{h_0 - h}) versus O((\mathsf{B} + \tspannorm{h^{\pi^\star}})\frac{\log n}{n})Helped
Use gain-dropping time \Tdrop rather than the prior dependence on 1/\DeltaApproximately Shifted Halpern Iteration versus prior Halpern iteration · General multichain average-reward MDPspolicy suboptimality: O(\frac{\Tdrop + 1}{n} \tinfnorm{h_0 - h}) versus O(\frac{1 + 1/\Delta}{n}\tinfnorm{h_0 - h})Helped
Add a Picard phase after approximately 1/(1-\gamma) Halpern iterationsHalpern-Then-Picard · Contractive fixed-point problems in Banach spacesfixed-point residual: 8e/(1+\gamma)Helped
Warm-start discounted value iteration using undiscounted value iterations and re-normalizationWarm-Start Halpern-Then-Picard · Discounted MDPsdiscounted value error: O(1/t)Helped
Set \gamma = 1 - 1/n and apply the warm-start discounted algorithmDiscounted value iteration with warm start · General multichain average-reward MDPspolicy suboptimality: \left(\Tdrop + 1 \right) \frac{71\min\left\{\spannorm{h}, \spannorm{h^{\pi^\star}} + \Tdrop + \spannorm{h^{\pi^\star}} \Helped
Use the gain-estimation phase and initialize Halpern iteration with its outputApproximately Shifted Halpern Iteration · General multichain average-reward MDPspolicy suboptimality: \frac{\frac{10}{3}\Tdrop + 13 + \frac{35}{n} + \frac{20}{n^2}}{n}\infnorm{h_0 - h}Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: policy suboptimality (gain) fixed-point error (Bellman residual) discounted value error

Baselines: Halpern iteration for average-reward MDPs (Zurek and Chen) average-to-discounted reduction with bounded transient time B (Wang et al.) anti-optimality operator discounted VI

Builds on: Halpern iteration discounted-to-average reduction (Wang et al.) Halpern iteration for average-reward MDPs (Zurek & Chen)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy