atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / MDPs and planning

Global Convergence for Average Reward Constrained MDPs with Primal-Dual Actor Critic Algorithm

NeurIPS 2025 · Reinforcement learning › MDPs and planning · approach: Offline RL sample complexity · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a primal-dual natural actor-critic with MLMC-based gradient estimates for infinite-horizon average-reward CMDPs under general parametrization, achieving O~(1/sqrt(T)) global optimality gap and constraint violation (known mixing time) and O~(T^{-(0.5-eps)}) without mixing-time knowledge.

Problem

Global convergence and constraint violation for infinite-horizon average-reward constrained MDPs with general parametrized policies, where prior best rate was O~(T^{-1/5}).

Approach

Combines a primal-dual natural actor-critic with nested inner loops for critic and NPG estimation, using geometric-length MLMC trajectory estimators so that mixing time need not be known and the inner loop length H can be kept small (near-single-timescale with K ~ T), yielding O(1/sqrt(T)) rates.</multeridea>

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use PDNAC with known mixing time instead of Algorithm 1 in [cite]Average-reward CMDP with general parameterization · Average-reward CMDP, general parameterization, known mixing timeglobal convergence rate: $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\bigg(1/T^{1/5}\bigg)$ -> $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\bigg(1/\sqrt{T}\bigg)$Helped
Use PDNAC with known mixing time instead of Algorithm 1 in [cite]Average-reward CMDP with general parameterization · Average-reward CMDP, general parameterization, known mixing timeconstraint violation rate: $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\bigg(1/T^{1/5}\bigg)$ -> $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\bigg(1/\sqrt{T}\bigg)$Helped
Use PDNAC without assuming mixing time is known instead of Algorithm 1 in [cite]Average-reward CMDP with general parameterization · Average-reward CMDP, general parameterization, unknown mixing timeglobal convergence rate: $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\bigg(1/T^{1/5}\bigg)$ -> $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\bigg(1/T^{0.5-\epsilon}\bigg)$Helped
Use PDNAC without assuming mixing time is known instead of Algorithm 1 in [cite]Average-reward CMDP with general parameterization · Average-reward CMDP, general parameterization, unknown mixing timeconstraint violation rate: $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\bigg(1/T^{1/5}\bigg)$ -> $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\bigg(1/T^{0.5-\epsilon}\bigg)$Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: global optimality gap average constraint violation

Baselines: Algorithm 1 in prior general-parameterization average-reward CMDP work (O(1/T^{1 tabular model-based CMDP methods (UC-CURL, PS-CURL) Triple-QA

Builds on: natural policy gradient MLMC-based actor-critic for average reward MDPs Lagrangian primal-dual CMDP methods

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy