atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Knowledge and temporal graphs

Towards Graph Foundation Models: Training on Knowledge Graphs Enables Transferability to General Graphs

NeurIPS 2025 · Graph learning › Knowledge and temporal graphs · approach: Logical query answering and rule reasoning · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes SCR, a graph foundation model pretrained on three KGs (WN18RR, FB15k-237, CodexM) via inductive KG reasoning with semantic-conditioned message passing, transferred zero-shot to node-, link- and graph-level tasks on general graphs.

Problem

Graph foundation models often need fine-tuning to transfer to new graphs; CMP-based KG reasoning models cannot effectively use node semantic features ("semantic isolation"), and task formats differ across link, node and graph level tasks.

Approach

Reformulate node and graph classification as KG link prediction on a task-specific KG, and add semantic-conditioned message passing (SCMP) that injects top-k semantic neighbors via a trainable initialization and a frozen, non-parametric semantic CMP branch merged by an MLP.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add semantic-injected entity initialization (INIT2) (ablation)SCR · Inductive KG reasoning, node classification, and graph classificationperformanceHelped
Add semantic-augmented relation graph (SARG) (ablation)SCR · Inductive KG reasoning, node classification, and graph classificationperformanceHelped
Add non-parametric semantic representation (NPSR) (ablation)SCR · Graph tasks, especially inductive KG reasoningperformanceHelped
Use relation-specific embeddings instead of identical relation embeddings (ablation)SCR · Node- and graph-level classificationperformanceHelped
Reduce the labeled node/graph-label edges (ablation)SCR · Node and graph classificationaccuracyHurt
Use semantic features from different sentence encoders (MPNet, MiniLM, or DistilBERT)SCR · KG inductive reasoningMRR: 0.451 -> 0.451No clear effect
Use all-ones features instead of the default semantic featuresSCR · KG inductive reasoning, Total AVGMRR: 0.451 -> 0.445Hurt
Use ontology features instead of the default semantic featuresSCR · KG inductive reasoning, Total AVGMRR: 0.451 -> 0.440Hurt
Use more KNN semantic neighborsULTRA · KG inductive reasoningreasoning performanceHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: WN18RR FB15k-237 CodexMedium GraIL inductive datasets InGram inductive datasets Cora Citeseer Pubmed Wisconsin Texas Actor IMDB-B

Benchmarks: GraIL inductive datasets (IndE) InGram inductive datasets (IndER) Cora Citeseer Pubmed Wisconsin Texas Actor IMDB-B COLLAB PROTEINS MUTAG

Metrics: MRR Hits@10 accuracy average rank

Baselines: ULTRA ProLINK OpenGraph AnyGraph GraphAny GPPT All-in-one GPrompt GPF GPF-plus GIN GCN

Builds on: ULTRA NBFNet GraIL SGC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy