atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Point cloud classification

Cloud4D: Estimating Cloud Properties at a High Spatial and Temporal Resolution

NeurIPS 2025 · Point clouds › Point cloud classification · approach: LiDAR point cloud compression and completion · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Cloud4D reconstructs 4D liquid water content and horizontal winds from six synchronized ground-based cameras using a homography-guided 2D-to-3D transformer, trained on LES-rendered synthetic data.

Problem

Existing satellite and radar instruments cannot observe individual shallow cumulus clouds at high spatial and temporal resolution, limiting validation and improvement of weather and climate models.

Approach

Map ground-camera DINOv2 features to cloud-layer planes via a cloud-specific homography, predict 2.5D cloud properties with a 2D CNN, then refine a full 3D LWC volume with a sparse transformer; wind is obtained by tracking height slices of reconstructed LWC with CoTracker3.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add sparse transformer (ablation)Cloud4D · Real-world radar evaluationLWC MAE (gm^{-3}): 0.030 -> 0.029Helped
add sparse transformer (ablation)Cloud4D · Real-world radar evaluationCBH MAE (m): 202.04 -> 189.58Helped
add sparse transformer (ablation)Cloud4D · Real-world radar evaluationCTH MAE (m): 299.04 -> 295.77Helped
add sparse transformer (ablation)Cloud4D · Real-world radar evaluationLWP MAE (kgm^{-2}): 0.063 -> 0.063No clear effect
add sparse transformer (ablation)Cloud4D · Real-world radar evaluationOcc F1: 0.70 -> 0.70No clear effect
drop 2 input views (ablation)Cloud4D · Real-world radar evaluationCBH MAE (m): 189.58 -> 316.28Hurt
drop 2 input views (ablation)Cloud4D · Real-world radar evaluationCTH MAE (m): 295.77 -> 371.71Hurt
drop 2 input views (ablation)Cloud4D · Real-world radar evaluationLWC MAE (gm^{-3}): 0.029 -> 0.038Hurt
drop 2 input views (ablation)Cloud4D · Real-world radar evaluationOcc F1: 0.70 -> 0.76Helped
drop 4 input views (ablation)Cloud4D · Real-world radar evaluationCBH MAE (m): 189.58 -> 325.03Hurt
drop 4 input views (ablation)Cloud4D · Real-world radar evaluationCTH MAE (m): 295.77 -> 383.16Hurt
drop 4 input views (ablation)Cloud4D · Real-world radar evaluationLWP MAE (kgm^{-2}): 0.063 -> 0.072Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MicroHH LES renders Terragen renders Real-world six-camera dataset with radar and wind profiler

Benchmarks: Radar LWC/LWP/CBH/CTH retrievals (real-world, 12 days) Wind profiler comparison Sentinel-2 and MODIS qualitative comparison

Metrics: F1 (cloud occupancy) MAE (LWC, LWP, CBH, CTH) relative error

Baselines: VIP-CT ERA5

Builds on: DINOv2 LoftUp EDM TRELLIS CoTracker3

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy