atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Noisy-Correspondence Learning for Text-to-Image Person Re-identification

CVPR 2024 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Unimodal-to-multimodal representation transfer · 126 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes RDE, a dual-embedding CLIP-based text-to-image person re-ID method that handles noisy image-text correspondences via a GMM-based consensus division of clean pairs and a log-exponential upper-bound triplet loss (TAL).

Problem

Text-to-image person re-identification assumes image-text training pairs are correctly aligned, but real-world annotation errors and low-quality images create noisy correspondences that degrade and overfit models.

Approach

Combines a basic global embedding and a token selection embedding, uses a two-component GMM on per-sample losses from both to take the consensus clean set (relabeling the rest as noisy or uncertain), and replaces the hardest-negative triplet ranking loss with a log-exponential upper bound over all negatives (TAL) to avoid model collapse under noise.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use RDE instead of IRRATIReID with CLIP ViT-B/16 · CUHK-PEDES (0% noise)Rank-1 accuracy: 73.38 -> 75.94Helped
Use RDE instead of IRRATIReID with CLIP ViT-B/16 · ICFG-PEDES (0% noise)Rank-1 accuracy: 63.46 -> 67.68Helped
Use RDE instead of IRRATIReID with CLIP ViT-B/16 · RSTPReid (0% noise)Rank-1 accuracy: 60.20 -> 65.35Helped
Use RDE instead of DECLTIReID with CLIP ViT-B/16 · CUHK-PEDES (50% noise)Rank-1 accuracy: 65.22 -> 71.33Helped
Use RDE instead of DECLTIReID with CLIP ViT-B/16 · ICFG-PEDES (50% noise)Rank-1 accuracy: 57.50 -> 63.76Helped
Use RDE instead of DECLTIReID with CLIP ViT-B/16 · RSTPReid (50% noise)Rank-1 accuracy: 56.75 -> 62.85Helped
Replace TAL with TRL (ablation)RDE · CUHK-PEDES (50% noise)Rank-1 accuracy: 71.33 -> 6.40Hurt
Replace TAL with TRL-S (ablation)RDE · CUHK-PEDES (50% noise)Rank-1 accuracy: 71.33 -> 67.38Hurt
Replace TAL with SDM (ablation)RDE · CUHK-PEDES (50% noise)Rank-1 accuracy: 71.33 -> 69.33Hurt
Remove TSE (ablation)RDE · CUHK-PEDES (50% noise)Rank-1 accuracy: 71.33 -> 70.70Hurt
Remove BGE (ablation)RDE · CUHK-PEDES (50% noise)Rank-1 accuracy: 71.33 -> 69.07Hurt
Remove CCD (ablation)RDE · CUHK-PEDES (50% noise)Rank-1 accuracy: 71.33 -> 63.11Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CUHK-PEDES ICFG-PEDES RSTPReid

Benchmarks: CUHK-PEDES ICFG-PEDES RSTPReid

Metrics: Rank-1 Rank-5 Rank-10 mAP mINP

Baselines: SSAN IVT IRRA DECL CLIP-C CFine TRL TRL-S SDM loss

Builds on: IRRA CLIP Triplet Ranking loss DECL memorization effect sample selection

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy