atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Conformal Linguistic Calibration: Trading-off between Factuality and Specificity

NeurIPS 2025 · Large language models › Language, safety and interpretability · approach: Uncertainty quantification for LLMs · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Conformal Linguistic Calibration, which reframes linguistic calibration as answer set prediction by rewriting answers into less specific claims over nested answer clusters, with LTT-based factuality guarantees, and distills the rewriter into Llama-3-8B.

Problem

LLM answers are often overconfident and unreliable; abstention withholds information, while linguistic hedging is hard to use downstream. The paper seeks a way to trade off factuality and specificity with probabilistic factuality guarantees.

Approach

Treat linguistic calibration as soft abstention: sample answers, cluster them into nested answer sets ordered by multiplicity, rewrite each nested set into a vaguer claim that describes the set (belief probing), and select the level with Learn-Then-Test to control factual error.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
rewrite responses into less specific claims using CLC instead of abstainingLlama3-8B-Instruct · SimpleQAfactualityHelped
rewrite responses into less specific claims using CLC instead of abstainingLlama3-8B-Instruct · Natural Questions devfactualityHelped
increase the answer multiplicity thresholdCLC · SimpleQAfactualityHelped
increase the answer multiplicity thresholdCLC · Natural QuestionsfactualityHelped
increase the answer multiplicity thresholdCLC · SimpleQACPMIHurt
increase the answer multiplicity thresholdCLC · Natural QuestionsCPMIHurt
use naive direct rewriting instead of CLC's calibrated rewriting (ablation)Llama-3-7b-Instruct · SimpleQA and Natural Questionsinformativeness trade-offHurt
use naive direct rewriting instead of CLC's calibrated rewriting (ablation)Llama-3-7b-Instruct · SimpleQA and Natural QuestionsinformativenessHurt
fine-tune Llama-3-8B-Instruct on CLC rewriting dataclaim rewriter · FActScore Core devFActScoreHelped
apply the out-of-the-box prompting baseline instead of the tuned rewriter (ablation)Llama-3-8B-Instruct claim rewriter · FActScore Core devinstruction adherenceHurt
frame answer clusters as an error-prone agent's belief rather than objective facts (ablation)CLC belief summarization · claim rewritingfaithfulness of belief generationHelped
use majority-vote answer multiplicity to order the nested clustersCLC · SimpleQA and Natural QuestionsfactualityHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: SimpleQA Natural Questions FActScore Core biographies Wikipedia dump

Benchmarks: SimpleQA Natural Questions FActScore

Metrics: factuality accuracy conformal coverage guarantee CPMI informativeness FActScore

Baselines: abstention baseline naive rewriting baseline Llama-3-8B-Instruct base rewriter SFT rewriter ORPO rewriter

Builds on: Learn-Then-Test semantic uncertainty possible world semantics FActScore DPO

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy