atlas

Research map / Image generation / Text-to-image diffusion

UltraHR-100K: Enhancing UHR Image Synthesis with A Large-Scale High-Quality Dataset

NeurIPS 2025 · Image generation › Text-to-image diffusion · approach: T2I evaluation and controllable adapters · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Builds UltraHR-100K, a 100K-image >3K-resolution text-to-image dataset with long captions, and a frequency-aware post-training method (DOTS timestep sampling plus DFT-based SWFR loss) that improves fine detail in UHR SANA generation.

Problem

Ultra-high-resolution text-to-image generation lacks a large-scale high-quality UHR dataset and training strategies tailored to fine-grained detail synthesis.

Approach

Filters 400K crawled high-resolution images by intersecting top-50% sets for GLCM detail richness, Shannon entropy complexity, and LAION aesthetic score, captions them with Gemini 2.0, and post-trains diffusion models with beta-distributed timestep sampling biased toward late denoising steps plus a DFT-domain soft-weighted high-frequency loss.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add FAPT to UltraHR-100K trainingSANA fine-tuned on UltraHR-100K · UltraHR-eval4KFID-patch: 20.932 -> 15.795Helped
Add FAPT to UltraHR-100K trainingSANA fine-tuned on UltraHR-100K · UltraHR-eval4KIS-patch: 5.020 -> 5.104Hurt
Add FAPT to UltraHR-100K trainingSANA fine-tuned on UltraHR-100K · UltraHR-eval4KCLIP: 31.85 -> 31.82Hurt
Add DOTS while omitting SWFR (ablation)Model A full fine-tuning on UltraHR-100K · UltraHR-eval4KFID: 33.99 -> 32.57Helped
Add DOTS while omitting SWFR (ablation)Model A full fine-tuning on UltraHR-100K · UltraHR-eval4KFID-patch: 20.93 -> 19.95Helped
Add SWFR to DOTS training (ablation)Model B full fine-tuning on UltraHR-100K · UltraHR-eval4KFID-patch: 19.95 -> 15.79Helped
Use the full UltraHR-100K dataset instead of the randomly sampled 15K subset (ablation)DOTS and SWFR training · UltraHR-eval4KFID-patch: 18.42 -> 15.79Helped
Use LoRA instead of full fine-tuning (ablation)SANA trained on full UltraHR-100K · UltraHR-eval4KFID-patch: 20.93 -> 35.02Hurt
Set DOTS α=3, β=4 instead of α=2, β=4 (ablation)DOTS training · UltraHR-eval4KFID-patch: 15.795 -> 22.143Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: UltraHR-100K Aesthetic-4K PixArt-30k

Benchmarks: UltraHR-eval4K Aesthetic-Eval@4096

Metrics: FID FID-patch IS IS-patch CLIP score FG-CLIP score user study preference

Baselines: PixArt-sigma SANA Diffusion4K FLUX + BSRGAN SD3.5 + BSRGAN I-Max HiFlow

Builds on: SANA Diffusion4K SD3 logit-normal sampling CAME optimizer

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy