atlas

Research map / Image generation / Text-to-image diffusion

Diffusion-4K: Ultra-High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models

CVPR 2025 · Image generation › Text-to-image diffusion · approach: Compositional text-to-image guidance · 20 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces Diffusion-4K, which builds the Aesthetic-4K benchmark (12,015-image 4K training set, 2,781-image eval set) with GLCM Score and Compression Ratio metrics, and fine-tunes SD3-2B and Flux-12B for direct 4096x4096 synthesis via a partitioned VAE and wavelet-based latent fine-tuning (WLF).

Problem

Direct ultra-high-resolution (4K) text-to-image synthesis with latent diffusion models is largely unexplored, and no public 4K training/evaluation benchmark exists; standard metrics (FID, Aesthetics, CLIPScore) are holistic and low-resolution, poorly capturing fine details.

Approach

Combines a partitioned VAE (F=16 via dilated first conv and partitioned decoder output, avoiding retraining) that fits 4K training in memory with a wavelet (Haar DWT) loss on the velocity-prediction objective that emphasizes high-frequency latent components, plus a 4K benchmark with texture-oriented metrics (GLCM Score, JPEG Compression Ratio).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use GPT-4o captions instead of LAION-5B captions (ablation)SD3-F16@4096 · Aesthetic-Eval@4096CLIPScore: 29.37 -> 33.12Helped
Use GPT-4o captions instead of LAION-5B captions (ablation)SD3-F16@4096 · Aesthetic-Eval@4096Aesthetics: 5.90 -> 5.97Helped
Use GPT-4o captions instead of LAION-5B captions (ablation)Flux-F16@4096 · Aesthetic-Eval@4096CLIPScore: 29.12 -> 33.67Helped
Use GPT-4o captions instead of LAION-5B captions (ablation)Flux-F16@4096 · Aesthetic-Eval@4096Aesthetics: 6.02 -> 6.11Helped
Add WLF fine-tuning instead of fine-tuning without WLF (ablation)SD3-F16@4096 · Aesthetic-Eval@4096CLIPScore: 34.14 -> 34.40Helped
Add WLF fine-tuning instead of fine-tuning without WLF (ablation)SD3-F16@4096 · Aesthetic-Eval@4096Aesthetics: 5.99 -> 6.07Helped
Add WLF fine-tuning instead of fine-tuning without WLF (ablation)SD3-F16@4096 · Aesthetic-Eval@4096GLCM Score: 0.74 -> 0.77Helped
Add WLF fine-tuning instead of fine-tuning without WLF (ablation)SD3-F16@4096 · Aesthetic-Eval@4096Compression Ratio: 11.41 -> 10.50Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Aesthetic-Train (12,015 images, GPT-4o captions) LAION-Aesthetics V2 6.5+ (evaluation source)

Benchmarks: Aesthetic-Eval@2048 Aesthetic-Eval@4096

Metrics: FID CLIPScore Aesthetics GLCM Score Compression Ratio rFID PSNR SSIM LPIPS

Baselines: PixArt-Σ Sana Stable Cascade SD3-F8 (original VAE) Flux-F8 (original VAE)

Builds on: Stable Diffusion 3 Flux rectified flow PixArt-Σ

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy