atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

Unsupervised Learning for Optimal Transport plan prediction between unbalanced graphs

NeurIPS 2025 · Graph learning › GNN architectures · approach: Theory of graph convolutional networks · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Trains a cross-attention GNN, conditioned on FUGW hyperparameters, to predict unbalanced Gromov-Wasserstein transport plans between graphs in an unsupervised way by minimizing the FUGW loss directly.

Problem

Computing fused unbalanced Gromov-Wasserstein (FUGW) optimal transport plans between graphs requires solving non-convex problems with cubic-cost iterative solvers, which does not scale to large graphs or repeated hyperparameter selection.

Approach

Amortized, unsupervised learning of FUGW plans: a GNN with cross-graph attention, conditioned on (alpha, rho) via Fourier encoding and node-weight prediction for unbalanced mass, is trained by directly minimizing the expected FUGW loss over graph pairs and hyperparameters, so no solver-computed plans are needed as labels.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Predict transport plans with ULOT instead of classical solversFUGW on IBC test graph pairs · IBC test graph pairsruntime: up to 100 times fasterHelped
Predict transport plans with ULOT instead of SinkhornFUGW on IBC test graph pairs · IBC test graph pairsspeed and loss error: 10 times faster for a smaller errorHelped
Use ULOT-predicted plans rather than IBPP plansFUGW on IBC test graph pairs · IBC test graph pairsFUGW loss correlation: 0.99 Pearson correlationHelped
Optimize the FUGW parameters for label propagationULOT on SBM pairs with similar clusters · SBM label propagation, similar clusters (1,2,3)accuracy: 0.87± 0.092Helped
Optimize the FUGW parameters for label propagationULOT on SBM pairs with different clusters · SBM label propagation, different clusters (1,2,3) to (1,2)accuracy: 0.74\pm 0.11Helped
Use ULOT as a warm start for IBPP rather than starting IBPP without itIBPP solver · IBC FUGWconvergence speedHelped
Increase $\rho$ for graphs sharing cluster 2ULOT transport plan · SBM graphs with clusters (1,2) and (2,3)transport mass assigned to the shared clusterHelped
Set $\alpha=1$ rather than using node-feature informationclassical FUGW solver · SBM graphs with clusters (1,2,3)cluster matchingHurt

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: simulated stochastic block model graphs Individual Brain Charting (IBC) fMRI cortical surfaces

Benchmarks: simulated SBM graphs IBC fMRI brain surfaces

Metrics: FUGW loss loss error relative to best solver computation time Pearson correlation of losses label propagation accuracy

Baselines: IBPP MM L-BFGS-B Sinkhorn Meta OT

Builds on: Graph Matching Network Meta OT Fused unbalanced Gromov-Wasserstein Flow matching positional encoding

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy