atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Sample complexity

Tight Bounds for Answering Adaptively Chosen Concentrated Queries

NeurIPS 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Sample complexity · approach: Computational thresholds in graphs and structure · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proves an Ω(min{1/γ, ε⁻² ln(1/(εβγ))}) query upper-limit for noise-addition and subsampling mechanisms answering adaptive concentrated queries on correlated data, and gives a simpler DP-based analysis of noise addition that supports more queries (O(min{1/γ, 1/(ε² ln²(1/ε))})).

Problem

Adaptive data analysis when samples are correlated: how many adaptively chosen concentrated queries can be answered accurately, given that the analyst's queries only need to be concentrated around their true means. Known efficient algorithms only support O(n) such queries versus O(n^2) in the i.i.d.

Approach

Shows that the O(n) barrier is inherent for noise-addition and subsampling mechanisms via an explicit correlated distribution (repeated elements across subsets) and an attack that identifies the sample; and proves accuracy of noisy empirical-mean Laplace mechanisms via differential-privacy advanced composition applied to a hybrid/oracle thought experiment, avoiding typical stability.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the simplified differential-privacy analysis for the Laplace mechanism instead of the prior typical-stability analysisLaplace mechanism for concentrated queries · Adaptive (ε, γ)-concentrated queriesmaximum queries k: O\left(\min\left\{\frac{1}{\gamma},\;\frac{1}{\varepsilon^{2}[\ln(1/\varepsilon)]^{2}}\right\}\right)Helped
Allow correlated data while restricting queries to Hoeffding-style concentrationNoise and Subsampling (NS) mechanisms · Hoeffding-style concentration, adaptive queriesmaximum queries: O(n)Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: statistical accuracy (alpha, beta) number of supported queries k

Baselines: typical stability noise addition (Bassily and Freund 2016 / Bassily et al.) compression-based algorithms

Builds on: Bassily and Freund 2016 concentrated queries typical stability advanced composition theorem Laplace mechanism

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy