atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Sample complexity

A Near Linear Query Lower Bound for Submodular Maximization

ICML 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Sample complexity · approach: Statistical-query lower bounds

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proves near-linear query lower bounds for approximating monotone submodular k-subset maximization (even estimating OPT) and a near-tight Õ(n/k) estimator plus matching lower bound for estimating the optimum of additive objectives.

Problem

Whether k-out-of-n subset selection for monotone submodular or additive objectives can be solved (or its optimal value estimated) with sublinear query complexity.

Approach

Reduces query algorithms to communication complexity of distributed set detection (via a blackboard protocol with polylog overhead and distributed SDPI), yielding near-linear query lower bounds; uses a two-level truncated linear function for the decision version, and a multi-scale quantile-estimation algorithm for additive functions achieving Õ(n/k) queries for value estimation.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use two-level truncation of a linear functionMonotone submodular optimal-value estimation · Submodular maximization, cardinality kquery complexity lower bound: eΩ(n)Helped
Use a linear additive objective instead of a general submodular objectiveFinding an approximately optimal k-subset · Additive maximization, cardinality kquery complexity lower bound: Ω(α5n/ log2(n))No clear effect
Estimate the optimum value rather than find an approximately optimal subsetMonotone additive maximization · Additive maximization, cardinality kquery complexity: (n/k) · poly(log(n), ϵ−1)Helped
Estimate the optimum value instead of find an approximately optimal subsetMonotone additive maximization · Additive maximization, cardinality kquery complexity lower bound: Ω(α3n/k log(n))Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: query complexity

Baselines: Li et al. 2022 Kuhnle 2021 greedy algorithm stochastic greedy

Builds on: Li et al. 2022 submodular query lower bound Kuhnle 2021 lower bound distributed strong data processing inequality (Braverman et al. 2016)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy