atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Multimodal LLMs

ShotBench: Expert-Level Cinematic Understanding in Vision-Language Models

NeurIPS 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Multimodal LLMs · approach: VLM capability analysis · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces ShotBench, an expert-annotated benchmark for VLM understanding of cinematic shot language, the ShotQA training set (~70k QA pairs), and ShotVL (Qwen2.5-VL-3B tuned with SFT then GRPO), which outperforms GPT-4o and Qwen2.5-VL-72B on ShotBench.

Problem

Current VLMs' comprehension of cinematography (shot size, framing, camera angle, lens, lighting, composition, camera movement) is underexplored and lacks rigorous evaluation, limiting fine-grained visual understanding and AI-assisted video generation.

Approach

A dedicated expert-annotated multiple-choice benchmark across eight cinematography dimensions drawn from Oscar-nominated films, plus a large-scale training set and a 3B VLM trained with SFT followed by GRPO using a rule-based correctness reward.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Train with SFT and GRPO on ShotQAQwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct · ShotBenchaccuracy (Avg): 46.1 -> 65.1Helped
Add SFT (ablation)Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct · ShotBenchaccuracy (Avg): 45.3 -> 54.3Helped
Add CoT to SFT (ablation)Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct · ShotBenchaccuracy (Avg): 54.3 -> 45.4Hurt
Add GRPO without SFT (ablation)Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct · ShotBenchaccuracy (Avg): 45.3 -> 53.5Helped
Add GRPO after SFT and CoT-SFT (ablation)Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct · ShotBenchaccuracy (Avg): 45.4 -> 53.8Helped
Add GRPO after SFT, without CoT (ablation)Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct · ShotBenchaccuracy (Avg): 54.3 -> 55.5Helped
Add CoT-SFT before GRPO instead of using SFT→GRPO (ablation)Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct · ShotBenchaccuracy (Avg): 55.5 -> 53.8Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ShotQA ShotBench

Benchmarks: ShotBench

Metrics: accuracy

Baselines: GPT-4o Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct Gemini-2.5-flash InternVL3-78B LLaVA-Video-7B

Builds on: GRPO DeepSeek-R1 Qwen2.5-VL VLMEvalKit ms-swift

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy