atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Differential equations and PDEs

DiffusionPDE: Generative PDE-Solving under Partial Observation

NeurIPS 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Differential equations and PDEs · approach: Neural PDE solvers · 26 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DiffusionPDE, a diffusion model trained on the joint distribution of PDE coefficients and solutions, which at inference is guided by sparse observations and PDE residual losses to solve forward and inverse PDE problems under partial observation.

Problem

Solving PDEs (forward and inverse) when only sparse observations (about 1-3% of points) of coefficients or solutions are available, where existing learning-based neural PDE solvers assume full observations.

Approach

Train one unconditional diffusion model (EDM-style) on the concatenated joint distribution of coefficient and solution fields, then at sampling time apply diffusion posterior sampling-style guidance with an observation MSE loss and a PDE residual loss, so one network handles any observation side and pattern.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use DiffusionPDE instead of the strongest listed baselineDarcy Flow forward solving with sparse observations · Darcy Flow forward, sparse observationsrelative error: 28.2% -> 2.5%Helped
use DiffusionPDE instead of the strongest listed baselineDarcy Flow inverse solving with sparse observations · Darcy Flow inverse, sparse observationserror rate: 41.1% -> 3.2%Helped
use DiffusionPDE instead of the strongest listed baselinePoisson forward solving with sparse observations · Poisson forward, sparse observationsrelative error: 100.9% -> 4.5%Helped
use DiffusionPDE instead of the strongest listed baselinePoisson inverse solving with sparse observations · Poisson inverse, sparse observationsrelative error: 105.8% -> 20.0%Helped
use DiffusionPDE instead of the strongest listed baselineHelmholtz forward solving with sparse observations · Helmholtz forward, sparse observationsrelative error: 98.2% -> 8.8%Helped
use DiffusionPDE instead of the strongest listed baselineHelmholtz inverse solving with sparse observations · Helmholtz inverse, sparse observationsrelative error: 132.8% -> 22.6%Helped
use DiffusionPDE instead of the strongest listed baselineNon-bounded Navier-Stokes forward solving with sparse observations · Non-bounded Navier-Stokes forward, sparse observationsrelative error: 101.4% -> 6.9%Helped
use DiffusionPDE instead of the strongest listed baselineNon-bounded Navier-Stokes inverse solving with sparse observations · Non-bounded Navier-Stokes inverse, sparse observationsrelative error: 96.0% -> 10.4%Helped
use DiffusionPDE instead of the strongest listed baselineBounded Navier-Stokes forward solving with sparse observations · Bounded Navier-Stokes forward, sparse observationsrelative error: 81.1% -> 3.9%Helped
use DiffusionPDE instead of the strongest listed baselineBounded Navier-Stokes inverse solving with sparse observations · Bounded Navier-Stokes inverse, sparse observationsrelative error: 69.5% -> 2.7%Helped
add PDE loss guidance to observation loss guidance (ablation)DiffusionPDE · Helmholtz solution, sparse observations on coefficient and solutionrelative error: 9.3% -> 0.6%Helped
add PDE loss guidance to observation loss guidance (ablation)DiffusionPDE · Helmholtz coefficient, sparse observations on coefficient and solutionrelative error: 13.2% -> 9.4%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Darcy Flow (FNO scripts) Poisson (finite difference) Helmholtz (finite difference) Non-bounded Navier-Stokes (FNO scripts) Bounded Navier-Stokes (Difftaichi) Burgers' equation (FNO scripts)

Benchmarks: Darcy Flow Poisson Helmholtz Non-bounded Navier-Stokes Bounded Navier-Stokes Burgers' equation

Metrics: relative error error rate (Darcy coefficient) standard deviation runtime

Baselines: PINO DeepONet PINNs FNO GraphPDE Shu et al. (2023) optimized CFG OFormer Diffusion with CFG RBF kernel U-Net

Builds on: EDM diffusion posterior sampling FNO PINO GraphPDE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy