atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / OOD and anomaly detection

Sharpness-diversity tradeoff: improving flat ensembles with SharpBalance

NeurIPS 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › OOD and anomaly detection · approach: Robust fine-tuning for OOD generalization · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Identifies a sharpness-diversity trade-off in deep ensembles of SAM-trained members and proposes SharpBalance, which trains each member with SAM only on a per-member sharpness-selected data subset, improving ensemble ID and OOD accuracy on CIFAR-10/100 and TinyImageNet.

Problem

Sharpness-aware training makes individual ensemble members flatter and more accurate but reduces their diversity, which limits the ensemble improvement in ID and OOD settings.

Approach

Each ensemble member applies SAM only to a sharpness-aware subset of the training data (the union of samples deemed sharp by all other members, chosen via per-sample gradient-norm sharpness) and standard SGD on the rest, which theory suggests yields a better sharpness-diversity trade-off than SAM on the full data.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
reduce individual-member sharpness with SAMDeep ensembles · CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, TinyImageNetdiversity (DER)Hurt
reduce diversity by minimizing individual-member sharpness with SAMDeep ensembles · CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, TinyImageNetensemble improvement rate (EIR)Hurt
reduce individual-member sharpness with SAMDeep ensembles · CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, TinyImageNetindividual-member OOD accuracyHelped
train ensemble members with SharpBalance using diversified sharpness-aware data subsetsDeep ensembles · CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, TinyImageNetensemble performanceHelped
train ensemble members with SharpBalance using diversified sharpness-aware data subsetsDeep ensembles · CIFAR-10-C, CIFAR-100-C, TinyImageNet-COOD performanceHelped
train models on randomly selected data subsets rather than the full datasetSAM-trained ensembles · Theoretical analysisdiversity at a given sharpnessHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 TinyImageNet CIFAR-10-C CIFAR-100-C TinyImageNet-C

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 TinyImageNet CIFAR-10-C CIFAR-100-C TinyImageNet-C

Metrics: test accuracy ensemble improvement rate diversity (variance, DER, KL) adaptive worst-case sharpness

Baselines: Deep Ensemble (SGD) Deep Ensemble with SAM EoA DiWA

Builds on: Sharpness Aware Minimization Deep Ensembles Ensemble of Averages Wishart moments random matrix theory

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy