atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

Prediction with Action: Visual Policy Learning via Joint Denoising Process

NeurIPS 2024 · Image generation › Autoregressive and latent generation · approach: Diffusion planning and policies · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes PAD, a DiT-based visual policy that jointly denoises future images and robot actions (and optionally depth), co-trained on BridgeData-v2 videos and robot demos, and evaluated on 50-task Metaworld and real-world Panda manipulation.

Problem

Visual robot policy learning from limited demonstrations; existing approaches either use image generation as a separate two-stage step (e.g., goal-image synthesis) or decouple prediction from action, missing shared physical dynamics and internet video pretraining benefits.

Approach

A single diffusion transformer jointly denoises future RGB images, depth images, and robot actions via token concatenation with attention masks, allowing co-training on action-free video data by masking missing modalities, initialized from an ImageNet-pretrained DiT.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use joint future-image prediction and action generation with PADSingle text-conditioned visual policy · MetaWorld (50 tasks)success rate: 57.4% -> 72.5%Helped
Use PAD instead of the strongest baselineReal-world manipulation policy · Real-world manipulation (in-distribution)success rate: 0.69 -> 0.72Helped
Add depth modality (ablation)PAD · Real-world manipulation (in-distribution)success rate: 0.72 -> 0.78Helped
Add future-image prediction (ablation)PAD · MetaWorld (50 tasks)success rate: 43.6% -> 72.5%Helped
Add co-training on internet video data (ablation)PAD · MetaWorld (50 tasks)success rate: 59.2% -> 72.5%Helped
Increase model size and computational allocation from XL/8 to XL/2 (ablation)PAD · MetaWorld (50 tasks)success rate: 48.2% -> 72.5%Helped
Vary model size and patchify configuration (ablation)PAD · MetaWorld (50 tasks)success rate: 62.4%, 68.4%, 64.5%, 72.5%Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: BridgeData-v2 Metaworld demonstrations real-world Panda teleoperation demonstrations

Benchmarks: Metaworld (50 tasks) real-world Panda manipulation (in-distribution and unseen-object generalization)

Metrics: success rate average success rate relative improvement

Baselines: Diffusion Policy SuSIE RT-1 RT-2* GR-1

Builds on: Diffusion Policy DiT DDPM latent diffusion SuSIE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy