atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Knowledge and temporal graphs

EGODE: An Event-attended Graph ODE Framework for Modeling Rigid Dynamics

NeurIPS 2024 · Graph learning › Knowledge and temporal graphs · approach: Heterogeneous graph learning · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes EGODE, a coupled graph ODE with a learnable event module for collision-triggered instantaneous updates, to model rigid-body dynamics at mesh-node and object levels.

Problem

Rigid-body dynamics simulation with GNN simulators struggles to combine continuous evolution with instantaneous collision changes and to model hierarchical mesh-node/object structure.

Approach

Couples a node-level and an object-level graph neural ODE and adds a learnable event detector that estimates collision times and applies discrete state updates at those times during ODE integration.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add the neural ODE component (ablation)EGODE · Physion contact prediction (eight scenarios)contact prediction accuracy (%): 89.8±1.7 -> 94.7±1.4 (Dominoes); 86.3±1.2 -> 90.0±1.0 (Collide)Helped
add the coupled architecture (ablation)EGODE · Physion contact prediction (eight scenarios)contact prediction accuracy (%): 90.7±1.0 -> 94.7±1.4 (Dominoes); 88.0±1.1 -> 90.0±1.0 (Collide)Helped
add the event module for collision modeling (ablation)EGODE · Physion contact prediction (eight scenarios)contact prediction accuracy (%): 90.3±1.5 -> 94.7±1.4 (Dominoes); 86.9±0.7 -> 90.0±1.0 (Collide)Helped
use EGODE instead of the strongest reported baselinePhysion · Physion contact prediction, all eight scenarioscontact prediction accuracy (%): 94.7±1.4 vs 88.8±2.0 (Dominoes); 90.0±1.0 vs 85.5±1.2 (Collide)Helped
use EGODE instead of SGNNRigidFall · RigidFall (|Train| = 5000, t = 20 and t = 40)prediction MSE (×10−2): 0.19±0.19 -> 0.12±0.11 (t = 20); 0.74±1.37 -> 0.46±0.42 (t = 40)Helped
set λ to 1 in the training objectiveEGODE · Physion Dominoes and Collidecontact prediction accuracyHelped
add resistive force proportional to velocityEGODE · Physion Collisionmotion under external forceMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Physion RigidFall

Benchmarks: Physion RigidFall

Metrics: contact prediction accuracy mean square error MAE

Baselines: MLP RNN SocialODE GNS DPI-Net EGNN GMN SGNN SEGNO

Builds on: neural ODE SGNN GNS MeshGraphNet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy