atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Approximately Equivariant Neural Processes

NeurIPS 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Equivariant and disentangled latent representations · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes approximately equivariant neural processes by adding a small number of learnable fixed inputs to equivariant decoders, with a theoretical result that any Hölder non-equivariant operator can be approximated this way.

Problem

Real-world stochastic processes are only approximately equivariant, yet existing equivariant neural processes enforce strict equivariance, and existing approximate-equivariance methods are tied to specific architectures (CNN/MLP) or loss modifications.

Approach

Approximate any non-equivariant operator between function spaces by an equivariant operator with B additional fixed learnable inputs; implement by adding these inputs to the embedding of an existing equivariant NP decoder, randomly zeroing them during training and zeroing them outside the training domain so predictions revert to equivariant ones OOD.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add fixed inputs to the TNP decoderTNP (T) · Synthetic 1-D GP IDtest log-likelihood: -0.500 \pm 0.004 -> -0.406 \pm 0.004Helped
Add fixed inputs to the TNP decoderTNP (T) · Synthetic 1-D GP OODtest log-likelihood: -0.430 \pm 0.007 -> -0.424 \pm 0.007No clear effect
Add fixed inputs to the TNP decoderTNP (T) · 2-D Smoketest log-likelihood: 4.181 \pm 0.011 -> 4.715 \pm 0.010Helped
Add fixed inputs to the ConvCNP decoderConvCNP (T) · Synthetic 1-D GP IDtest log-likelihood: -0.499 \pm 0.004 -> -0.430 \pm 0.004Helped
Add fixed inputs to the ConvCNP decoderConvCNP (T) · 2-D Smoketest log-likelihood: 3.637 \pm 0.041 -> 3.827 \pm 0.011Helped
Use relaxed convolutionsConvCNP (T) · 2-D Smoketest log-likelihood: 3.637 \pm 0.041 -> 4.006 \pm 0.010Helped
Add fixed inputs to the EquivCNP decoderEquivCNP (E) · 2-D Smoketest log-likelihood: 4.194 \pm 0.015 -> 4.233 \pm 0.012No clear effect
Add fixed inputs to the PT-TNP decoderPT-TNP (T) · ERA5 2-D Europe 2019test log-likelihood: 1.06 \pm 0.01 -> 1.22 \pm 0.01Helped
Add fixed inputs and zero them outside the training domainPT-TNP (T) · ERA5 2-D US 2019test log-likelihood: 0.55 \pm 0.01 -> 0.55 \pm 0.01No clear effect
Add fixed inputs to the PT-TNP decoderPT-TNP (T) · ERA5 4-D Europe 2019test log-likelihood: 1.14 \pm 0.01 -> 1.21 \pm 0.01Helped
Add fixed inputs to the PT-TNP decoderPT-TNP (T) · ERA5 4-D US 2019test log-likelihood: 0.73 \pm 0.01 -> 0.76 \pm 0.01Helped
Increase fixed-input basis functions from 0 to 1 (ablation)Approximately equivariant NPs · Synthetic 1-D GPtest log-likelihoodHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Gibbs-kernel GP synthetic 1-D regression 2-D smoke plume simulations (PhiFlow) ERA5 surface air temperature 2018-2019

Benchmarks: 1-D GP Gibbs kernel (ID/OOD) 2-D smoke plumes ERA5 2-D and 4-D environmental regression (Europe, central US)

Metrics: average test log-likelihood

Baselines: TNP ConvCNP RelaxedConvCNP EquivCNP PT-TNP

Builds on: Neural processes ConvCNP EquivCNP TE-TNP Relaxed group convolutions

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy