atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Sample complexity

On Differentially Private Subspace Estimation in a Distribution-Free Setting

NeurIPS 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Sample complexity · approach: Statistical-query lower bounds · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes measures of dataset "easiness" for differentially private subspace estimation based on multiplicative singular-value gaps, with matching-style upper and lower sample-complexity bounds independent of dimension in some regimes.

Problem

Differentially private subspace estimation (top-k subspace of unit-norm data) suffers polynomial dependence on the ambient dimension in worst case; it is unclear how to quantify when a dataset is "easy" enough to avoid this dependence.

Approach

Defines weak and strong subspace estimators whose utility guarantees depend on multiplicative singular-value gaps in the input dataset (sqrt of tail energy over sigma_k, or sigma_{k+1}/sigma_k), realized via sample-and-aggregate over random subsets with FriendlyCore aggregation, and proves lower bounds via fingerprinting codes with padding-and-permuting.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the weak multiplicative singular-value gap to quantify dataset easinessPrivate weak subspace estimation · Weak subspace estimationsample complexity n: $\tilde{O}_{\varepsilon,\delta}\paren{k + \frac{k^2 \sqrt{d}}{\lambda}}$Helped
Use the strong multiplicative singular-value gap to quantify dataset easinessPrivate strong subspace estimation · Strong subspace estimationsample complexity n: $\widetilde{O}_{\varepsilon,\delta}\paren{k + \frac{k^3 d}{\lambda^2}}$Helped
Use multiplicative singular-value gaps in the input dataset rather than an additive-gap measurePrivate subspace estimation · High-dimensional regimessample complexity dependence on dimensionHelped
Use the weak-gap condition instead of the strong-gap conditionPrivate subspace estimation · Subspace estimationsample complexity n: $\tilde{O}_{\varepsilon,\delta}\paren{k + \frac{k^2 \sqrt{d}}{\lambda}}$; $\widetilde{O}_{\varepsilon,\delta}\paren{k + Mixed

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: projection usefulness (Frobenius) mean estimation error

Baselines: additive-gap subspace recovery (Dwork et al.) Gaussian noise on covariance (noisy PCA)

Builds on: FriendlyCore sample-and-aggregate fingerprinting codes lower bound framework Dwork et al. private subspace recovery (additive gap)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy