Research map / Image generation / Fast diffusion sampling
Diffusion Tuning: Transferring Diffusion Models via Chain of Forgetting
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes Diff-Tuning, a fine-tuning method for diffusion models that exploits a "chain of forgetting" in the reverse process by pairing knowledge retention (on pre-sampled data from the pre-trained model) with time-weighted knowledge reconsolidation on the target data.
Problem
Standard fine-tuning of pre-trained diffusion models forgets general denoising knowledge and overfits downstream data, while PEFT methods for diffusion models are not tailored to diffusion's multi-step structure.
Approach
Observes that a pre-trained diffusion model's zero-shot denoising transferability decreases monotonically along the reverse process (chain of forgetting), and uses time-dependent loss weights so that the fine-tuned model retains pre-trained knowledge at small t (retention on pre-sampled data) and adapts to the new domain at large t (reconsolidation on target data).
Key results
- Diff-Tuning achieves average FID 10.63 across 8 downstream datasets vs 14.36 for full fine-tuning (26.0% relative improvement) and 12.81 for DiffFit.
- On ControlNet with Stable Diffusion, Diff-Tuning reduces average sudden convergence steps from 9.0k to 6.6k (about 24% faster) across five conditions.
- Applying Diff-Tuning to DiffFit (Diff-Tuning*) improves its converged performance, and DiffFit's EWC values are reported as 2.42x larger than Diff-Tuning's per the paper's analysis.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apply Diff-Tuning instead of full fine-tuning | DiT-XL-2-256x256 · 8 downstream class-conditional datasets (average) | FID: 14.36 -> 10.63 | Helped |
| Apply Diff-Tuning to ControlNet | Stable Diffusion v1.5 with ControlNet · 6 control conditions (average) | sudden convergence steps: 9.0k -> 6.6k | Helped |
| Add knowledge retention to knowledge reconsolidation (ablation) | Diff-Tuning · DF20M | FID | Helped |
| Add knowledge reconsolidation to knowledge retention (ablation) | Diff-Tuning · DF20M | FID | Helped |
| Vary the reconsolidation coefficient from the default ψ(t)=t (ablation) | Diff-Tuning · Stanford Cars | FID | Mixed |
| Set τ=0, reducing Diff-Tuning to standard fine-tuning (ablation) | Diff-Tuning · Stanford Cars | FID | Hurt |
| Use the entire 1.2M-image ImageNet source dataset for retention instead of pre-sampled data (ablation) | Diff-Tuning · Stanford Cars | FID | Hurt |
| Vary the number of pre-sampled retention examples (ablation) | Diff-Tuning · Stanford Cars | FID | Mixed |
| Add Diff-Tuning to DiffFit (ablation) | DiffFit · SUN397 | FID | Helped |
Surprising findings
- Using the entire 1.2M ImageNet source dataset for knowledge retention gives suboptimal results compared with a smaller pre-sampled set from the pre-trained model.
- Replacing the last denoising steps with the original pre-trained model can achieve competitive or slightly better quality than the fine-tuned model.
Limitations
- Requires constructing a pre-sampled augmented dataset from the pre-trained model, adding computational cost.
- Introduces extra hyperparameters (retention and reconsolidation weighting functions) whose design is heuristic.
- Similarity-based sudden convergence metric is imperfect and needs human assessment; similarity scores may not reflect quality.
Experimental setup
Datasets: ImageNet Food101 SUN397 DF20-Mini Caltech101 CUB-200-2011 ArtBench-10 Oxford Flowers Stanford Cars COCO ADE20k
Benchmarks: Food101 SUN397 DF20-Mini Caltech101 CUB-200-2011 ArtBench-10 Oxford Flowers Stanford Cars COCO ADE20k
Metrics: FID-10K average FID relative improvement sudden convergence steps SSIM MSE pixel accuracy EWC value
Baselines: Full Fine-tuning AdaptFormer BitFit VPT-Deep LoRA DiffFit ControlNet
Builds on: DiT DiffFit ControlNet Elastic Weight Consolidation DDIM
Closest papers by meaning
- Domain Guidance: A Simple Transfer Approach for a Pre-trained Diffusion Model (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.89)
- Stochastic Control for Fine-tuning Diffusion Models: Optimality, Regularity, and Convergence (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.89)
- Transfer Learning for Diffusion Models (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.89)
- Efficient Fine-Tuning and Concept Suppression for Pruned Diffusion Models (CVPR 2025 · similarity 0.89)
- Distilling ODE Solvers of Diffusion Models into Smaller Steps (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.88)
- Diffusion Model Patching via Mixture-of-Prompts (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.88)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
