atlas

Research map / Image generation / Text-to-image diffusion

Efficient Fine-Tuning and Concept Suppression for Pruned Diffusion Models

CVPR 2025 · Image generation › Text-to-image diffusion · approach: Multi-concept composition · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a bilevel optimization framework that jointly fine-tunes a pruned Stable Diffusion 2.1 via distillation while unlearning undesired concepts (artist styles, NSFW content), outperforming two-stage distill-then-unlearn pipelines.

Problem

Pruned diffusion models recovered via knowledge distillation inherit undesirable concepts (copyrighted artist styles, NSFW content) from the base model, and sequentially fine-tuning then unlearning is inefficient and suboptimal.

Approach

Reformulates pruned-model fine-tuning as a bilevel problem where the lower level performs diffusion and distillation fine-tuning and the upper level performs concept unlearning (ESD-style negative guidance), solved with a first-order penalty-based double-loop method so that unlearning and restoration are optimized jointly.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace two-stage distillation then ESD with joint bilevel fine-tuning and concept removalpruned Stable Diffusion 2.1 · Artist ErasureCSD score: 61.45 -> 39.04Helped
Replace two-stage distillation then ESD with joint bilevel fine-tuning and concept removalpruned Stable Diffusion 2.1 · Artist ErasureCP score: 84.0 -> 97.6Helped
Replace two-stage distillation then ESD with joint bilevel fine-tuning and concept removalpruned Stable Diffusion 2.1 · MS-COCO-2017 validationFID: 30.38 -> 22.24Helped
Replace two-stage distillation then ESD with joint bilevel fine-tuning and concept removalpruned Stable Diffusion 2.1 · Artist ErasureCLIP similarity: 30.78 -> 26.28Helped
Use bilevel ESD rather than two-stage ESDpruned Stable Diffusion 2.1 · MMA adversarial NSFW promptsNSFW removal: 93.70 -> 91.60Hurt
Use bilevel ESD rather than two-stage ESDpruned Stable Diffusion 2.1 · Ring-a-Bell adversarial NSFW promptsNSFW removal: 77.27 -> 94.32Helped
Add distillation during fine-tuning of the pruned model (ablation)APTP-pruned Stable Diffusion 2.1 · MS-COCO-2017 validationFIDHelped
Use pruning instead of random initialization (ablation)small diffusion model with distillation · MS-COCO-2017 fine-tuningconvergence speedHelped
Use standard two-stage fine-tuning followed by concept unlearning instead of bilevel optimizationpruned Stable Diffusion 2.1 · Artist style removalgeneration qualityHurt
Use bilevel ESD instead of two-stage ESDpruned Stable Diffusion 2.1 · MS-COCO-2017 validationFID: 32.47 -> 26.80Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MS-COCO-2017 I2P Ring-A-Bell MMA

Benchmarks: MS-COCO-2017 validation (FID, CLIP) artist style erasure (Van Gogh, Picasso, Monet) I2P NSFW prompts Ring-A-Bell MMA

Metrics: CLIP similarity CP score CSD score FID NudeNet detection percentage

Baselines: Stable Diffusion 2.1 Distilled Model + ESD Distilled Model + UCE Distilled Model + ConceptPrune Distilled Model (Eq. 8)

Builds on: APTP ESD UCE ConceptPrune BK-SDM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy