atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Learning from Snapshots of Discrete and Continuous Data Streams

NeurIPS 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Prediction and decision losses · approach: Algorithms with explicit predictors · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Studies learnability of concept and pattern classes from continuous and discrete data streams via snapshot queries in two settings (update-and-deploy and blind-prediction), showing Littlestone dimension characterizes update-and-deploy learnability, non-trivial classes are unlearnable under blind prediction, and proposing a query-learning-distance theory for discrete pattern classes.

Problem

How to learn functions online from continuous-time data streams when the learner only observes snapshots at chosen times, and what combinatorial dimensions characterize learnability in the update-and-deploy and blind-prediction settings.

Approach

Formalizes learning from snapshots of continuous streams with two query-based settings; shows a randomized uniform-timestamp sampler (using SOA predictor) achieves finite expected error bounded by Delta*LD(H) under update-and-deploy, while under blind prediction non-trivial concept classes are unlearnable and adaptive samplers are needed for pattern classes; defines query-learning distance (QLD) f

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use uniform random query timestamps over intervals of width Δ and deploy SOAUpdate-and-deploy learning of concept classes with finite Littlestone dimension · Continuous streamsexpected mistake-bound: ≤ Δ LD(H)Helped
apply any linear-querying learner to a concept class with infinite Littlestone dimensionUpdate-and-deploy learning · Continuous streams; LD(H) = ∞expected mistake-bound: = ∞Hurt
use blind-prediction instead of update-and-deploy for a non-trivial concept classLearning concept classes with a classifier that labels two points differently · Continuous streamsexpected mistake-bound: = ∞Hurt
use random sampling rather than adaptive samplingLearning the constructed continuous pattern class P · Continuous pattern class P; update-and-deployexpected mistake-bound: = ∞Hurt
adaptively query at timestamps when future stream information is revealedLearning the constructed continuous pattern class P · Continuous pattern class P; blind-predictionexpected mistake-bound: = 0Helped
characterize deterministic realizable learning with Q queries using query-learning distance QLDLearning discrete pattern classes in blind-prediction · Discrete pattern classes; query budget Qoptimal mistake-bound: M_Q(\mathcal{P}) = QLD(\mathcal{P}, Q)Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: expected mistake bound

Builds on: Littlestone dimension Standard Optimal Algorithm self-directed online learning partial monitoring

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy