atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Matrix and tensor methods

An Autoencoder-Like Nonnegative Matrix Co-Factorization for Improved Student Cognitive Modeling

NeurIPS 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Matrix and tensor methods · approach: Structured low-rank learning · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes AE-NMCF, an autoencoder-like nonnegative matrix co-factorization that embeds psychometric monotonicity into an encoder-decoder pipeline to improve knowledge proficiency estimation while keeping performance prediction accurate, optimized by projected gradient block coordinate descent with Lipschitz step sizes.

Problem

Student cognitive modeling needs both accurate prediction of student exercise performance and accurate estimation of knowledge proficiency, but matrix factorization methods predict well with uninterpretable latents while proficiency estimates are poor, especially under sparse response data.

Approach

Co-factorize the student response matrix and an exercise-knowledge association matrix sharing an exercise-characteristic factor, derive student knowledge proficiency as V^T U, and reconstruct responses through a probit link with exercise difficulty so that monotonicity between proficiency and success probability is enforced end-to-end.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use AE-NMCF instead of SNMCFstudent performance prediction · Junyi-sACC: 0.6878±0.0192 -> 0.7065±0.0285Helped
Use AE-NMCF instead of SNMCFstudent performance prediction · Quanlang-sACC: 0.7417±0.0051 -> 0.7531±0.0064Helped
Use AE-NMCF instead of SNMCFstudent performance prediction · SLP-Bio-sRMSE: 0.4236±0.0082 -> 0.3996±0.0060Helped
Use AE-NMCF instead of SNMCFstudent performance prediction · FrcSubRMSE: 0.3349±0.0029 -> 0.3476±0.0088Hurt
Use AE-NMCF instead of DeepCDFstudent performance prediction · Junyi-sRMSE: 0.3874±0.0036 -> 0.4514±0.0193Hurt
remove decoder (ablation)AE-NMCF · FrcSubACC: 0.8267±0.0048 -> 0.7523±0.0118Hurt
remove decoder (ablation)AE-NMCF · Junyi-sACC: 0.7065±0.0285 -> 0.6261±0.0524Hurt
remove decoder (ablation)AE-NMCF · Quanlang-sACC: 0.7531±0.0064 -> 0.6187±0.0278Hurt
remove decoder (ablation)AE-NMCF · SLP-Bio-sACC: 0.7553±0.0101 -> 0.6582±0.0099Hurt
remove decoder (ablation)AE-NMCF · SLP-His-sACC: 0.8072±0.0019 -> 0.7224±0.0062Hurt
remove decoder (ablation)AE-NMCF · SLP-EngACC: 0.7632±0.0062 -> 0.5511±0.0184Hurt
remove encoder (ablation)AE-NMCF · FrcSubACC: 0.8267±0.0048 -> 0.8156±0.0060Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: FrcSub Junyi-s Quanlang-s SLP-Bio-s SLP-His-s SLP-Eng

Benchmarks: FrcSub Junyi-s Quanlang-s SLP-Bio-s SLP-His-s SLP-Eng

Metrics: ACC RMSE KRC (rc)

Baselines: NMF MCF GNMF NMMF SNMCF DINA DIRT DeepCDF QRCDM

Builds on: nonnegative matrix factorization matrix co-factorization SNMCF DINA projected gradient method

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy