atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Permutation-Based Hypothesis Testing for Neural Networks

AAAI 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Sparse concepts and hypothesis testing · 7 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes permutation-based hypothesis tests for neural networks, using partial derivatives of the network output w.r.t. an input to test for nonlinear and general association between that input and the outcome.

Problem

Neural networks are predictive but offer little statistical inference on whether input features are associated with outcomes, and whether such associations are linear or nonlinear.

Approach

Build gradient-based test statistics from network partial derivatives and estimate null distributions by retraining networks on permuted data: a GAM-residual permutation for the nonlinearity test and a feature-permutation for the association test.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the neural-network permutation test rather than LM or GAM for nonsmooth associationsAssociation testing · Simulation: nonsmooth nonlinear associationspowerHelped
Use the neural-network permutation test rather than LM for smooth nonlinear associationsAssociation testing · Simulation: smooth nonlinear associationspowerHelped
Use a neural network permutation test rather than LM or GAM for linear associationsAssociation testing · Simulation: linear associationspowerMixed
Add a second hidden layer to the association-test networkNN-1 association test · Simulation: nonsmooth nonlinear associations at small signalpowerHelped
Use correlated predictors instead of independent predictorsNeural-network permutation association test · Simulation: X1 association testType-I error: 0.05 -> 0.09 -> 0.32Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: simulated data CHOP pediatric concussion data AMP PD whole genome sequencing data

Benchmarks: simulation studies (Type-I error and power) CHOP pediatric concussion data AMP PD genetic data

Metrics: Type-I error power p-values

Baselines: linear model generalized additive model NN-1 NN-2

Builds on: Racine (1997) partial derivative test generalized additive models neural additive models

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy