Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Fairness
Group Fairness in Peer Review
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Closest papers by meaning
- Dissecting Submission Limit in Desk-Rejections: A Mathematical Analysis of Fairness in AI Conference Policies (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.86)
- Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.84)
- Position: The Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Community Should Adopt a More Transparent and Regulated Peer Review Process (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.84)
- From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer Review (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.83)
- Allocate Marginal Reviews to Borderline Papers Using LLM Comparative Ranking (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.81)
- FFB: A Fair Fairness Benchmark for In-Processing Group Fairness Methods (ICLR 2024 · similarity 0.81)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
