atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Online Conversion Rate Prediction via Multi-Interval Screening and Synthesizing under Delayed Feedback

AAAI 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Group-robust classification · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MISS, a multi-head screening model over multiple waiting windows plus a light-weight synthesizing model trained on an assembled pipeline and a global positive weighting, for delayed-feedback online CVR prediction.

Problem

Online conversion rate prediction under delayed feedback, where short waiting windows introduce fake negatives and long windows cause data staleness, and existing aggregation of multi-window models lacks consensus.

Approach

A shared-bottom network with output heads trained on duplicated data pipelines of different waiting windows, aggregated by a light-weight softmax-weighted synthesizing model trained on the latest converted positives plus real negatives, and a global importance-style positive weighting controlled by a single hyperparameter alpha instead of per-sample weight models.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use MISS instead of the strongest baseline, DEFUSECriteo Dataset · Criteo DatasetAUC: 16.8%Helped
use MISS instead of the strongest baseline, FTPTencent Dataset · Tencent DatasetAUC: 6.1%Helped
add the duplication mechanism to the screening heads (ablation)MISS · CriteoAUC: 0.8451 -> 0.8477Helped
add the synthesizing model instead of using the last head prediction (ablation)MISS · CriteoAUC: 0.8390 -> 0.8477Helped
use dynamic aggregation instead of averaging head predictions (ablation)MISS · CriteoAUC: 0.8469 -> 0.8477Helped
train the synthesizing model on the assembled pipeline instead of the maximum-window dataset (ablation)MISS · CriteoPR-AUC: 0.6430 -> 0.6495Helped
use head predictions alone instead of adding middle-layer results to synthesizing-model inputs (ablation)MISS · CriteoAUC: 0.8477 -> 0.8477No clear effect
use head predictions alone instead of adding middle-layer results to synthesizing-model inputs (ablation)MISS · CriteoNLL: 0.3857 -> 0.3856No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Criteo Conversion Logs Tencent Advertising Algorithm Competition 2017

Benchmarks: Criteo Conversion Logs Tencent Advertising Algorithm Competition 2017

Metrics: AUC NLL PR-AUC

Baselines: Vanilla FNW FNC ES-DFM DEFUSE MTDFM FTP

Builds on: ES-DFM FNW FTP DEFUSE importance sampling

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy