atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Submodular and game algorithms

Nearly Equitable Allocations beyond Additivity and Monotonicity

AAAI 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Submodular and game algorithms · approach: Fair division of indivisible goods · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Studies existence and efficient computation of EQx (equitability up to any item) allocations of indivisible goods and chores, giving existence for monotone valuations, polynomial algorithms for two agents with additive objective valuations, and hardness results for nonmonotone subjective valuations.

Problem

Fair division of indivisible items: whether EQx (equitability up to any item) allocations exist and can be computed efficiently beyond monotone additive valuations, including when items are goods and chores.

Approach

Extends the Add-and-Fix greedy procedure to monotone non-additive valuations (choosing poorest agent and greedy goods), proves existence via leximin++ for identical chores, gives a two-way greedy algorithm for two agents with additive objective valuations, and uses reductions from Partition/3-Partition for nonmonotone subjective cases.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
allow monotone valuations beyond additive valuationsEQx allocation existence · Indivisible items with monotone valuationsEQx existenceHelped
restrict monotone valuations to weakly well-layered valuationsGreedy Add-and-Fix · Indivisible goods; weakly well-layered valuationscomputation timeHelped
use the approximate Greedy Add-and-Fix algorithm with ε > 0Monotone valuations · Indivisible goods; general monotone valuationscomputation timeHelped
allow nonmonotone subjective additive valuations, including mixed itemsEQx allocation existence · Two agents with normalized valuationsEQx existenceHurt
use objective additive valuations with two agentsTwo-Way Greedy Algorithm · Two agents; goods and choresEQx existence and computationHelped
require chores to have identical values across agentsLeximin++ allocation · Additive objective valuationsEQx existenceHelped
restrict objective additive valuations to a single choreEQx allocation existence · Additive goods and one choreEQx existenceHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Builds on: Add-and-Fix leximin++ EFx for identical valuations

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy