atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Causal discovery

Identification of Causal Structure with Latent Variables Based on Higher Order Cumulants

AAAI 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Causal discovery · approach: Identifiability with hidden confounders · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes higher-order-cumulant identifiability conditions to detect whether a causal edge exists between two observed variables sharing one latent confounder in a non-Gaussian linear model, and to orient that edge, evaluated on synthetic data.

Problem

Causal discovery with latent variables: fully identifying the structure where two observed variables are both influenced by one latent variable and may have a directed edge between them, which prior methods (FCI, GIN, RCD, LvLiNGAM) do not identify.

Approach

Specific combinations of higher-order joint cumulants of two observed variables satisfy a tetrad-like constraint (C_{i+1,j+1}^2 = C_{i,j+2} C_{i+2,j}) iff no directed edge exists; with an edge, fifth-order cumulants give a quadratic for the mixing-coefficient ratios, and a third-order cumulant asymmetry criterion determines direction.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use higher-order cumulant criteria to detect edges under a shared latent variableProposed method · Case 1, synthetic linear dataaccuracy: 0.64; 0.75; 0.60; 0.69 (Exp)Helped
Use higher-order cumulants and asymmetry criterion for causal directionProposed method · Case 2, synthetic linear dataaccuracy: 0.79; 0.88; 0.91; 0.92 (Exp)Helped
Apply the method to nonlinear causal relationshipsProposed method · Case 2, nonlinear Exp data, n=100000accuracy: 0.84Helped
Apply the method to nonlinear causal relationshipsProposed method · Case 2, nonlinear Gamma dataaccuracy: 0.38; 0.36; 0.34; 0.37Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic linear non-Gaussian data (exponential, gamma, Gumbel noise)

Benchmarks: synthetic two-variable latent confounder graphs (Case 1 and Case 2)

Metrics: accuracy type I error type II error

Baselines: LiNGAM ANM LvLiNGAM

Builds on: LiNGAM LvLiNGAM overcomplete ICA tetrad constraint

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy