atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Treatment effects

Causal Effect Identification in lvLiNGAM from Higher-Order Cumulants

ICML 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Treatment effects · approach: Proximal and deep causal effect estimation · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proves that causal effects in lvLiNGAM are identifiable from higher-order cumulants with a single proxy variable (even when the proxy causes the treatment) or a single instrument shared by multiple treatments, and gives estimators.

Problem

Causal effect identification and estimation in latent variable LiNGAM when a single proxy variable may causally affect the treatment, or when instrumental variables are underspecified (fewer instruments than treatments), settings where covariance-based and existing higher-order methods fail.

Approach

Uses higher-order cumulant polynomial equations (roots of a degree l+1 polynomial plus a linear cumulant system) applied to pairs of variables, combined with subtracting proxy/instrument contributions to remove edges, to identify treatment effects with one proxy or one instrument.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use Cumulant instead of Cross-MomentProxy-variable setting, G1 · G1relative absolute errorHurt
Use Cumulant instead of competing methodsProxy-variable setting with multiple latent variables or an edge from Z to T · G2 and G3relative absolute errorHelped
Add the minimization technique to Cumulant (ablation)Cumulant on the proxy-variable graph G3 · G3relative absolute errorHelped
Use Cross-Moment or GRICA instead of a consistent estimatorProxy-variable settings with multiple latent variables or an edge from Z to T · G2 and G3relative absolute errorHurt
Use ReLVLiNGAM instead of CumulantProxy-variable setting · G1 and G3relative absolute errorHurt
Use Cumulant instead of Min Norm, GRICA, or ReLVLiNGAMUnderspecified instrumental-variable setting with two treatments and one instrument · Underspecified instrumental-variable graphaverage relative absolute errorHelped
Use GRICA instead of Cumulant at small sample sizesUnderspecified instrumental-variable setting · Underspecified instrumental-variable graph, small samplesaverage relative absolute errorHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic lvLiNGAM simulations New Jersey fast-food minimum wage dataset (Card and Krueger)

Benchmarks: synthetic lvLiNGAM graphs G1-G3 underspecified IV graph New Jersey minimum wage data

Metrics: relative absolute error of causal effect median over 100 simulations interquartile range

Baselines: Cross-Moment GRICA ReLVLiNGAM Min Norm TSLS projection

Builds on: LiNGAM Cross-Moment method GRICA two-stage least squares ReLVLiNGAM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy