atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Clustering

Graph Clustering Methods Derived from Column Subset Selection (Student Abstract)

AAAI 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Clustering · approach: Spectral clustering algorithms · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that spectral clustering under the NCut criterion can be reformulated as column subset selection on a normalized edge matrix, yielding a black-box graph clustering algorithm that can use any CSS method.

Problem

Multi-way spectral clustering minimizes NCut, which is an NP-hard combinatorial problem usually approximated by relaxations; the paper asks whether CSS, a feature selection/dimension reduction technique, can compute spectral clusterings.

Approach

Builds a normalized edge matrix whose columns are scaled edge vectors; proves that selecting n-k linearly independent columns (a CSS solution) yields a subgraph whose connected components are a k-way partition, with NCut equal to the CSS approximation error. This gives a black-box graph clustering algorithm that plugs in any CSS algorithm (QRP, GREEDY).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use GREEDY instead of QRP for CSS-based clusteringCSS-derived graph clustering · COIL image graph, k=2NCut: 0.0031 -> 0.0006Helped
Use GREEDY instead of QRP for CSS-based clusteringCSS-derived graph clustering · COIL image graph, k=3NCut: 0.0059 -> 0.0029Helped
Use GREEDY instead of QRP for CSS-based clusteringCSS-derived graph clustering · COIL image graph, k=4NCut: 0.0164 -> 0.0058Helped
Use GREEDY instead of QRP for CSS-based clusteringCSS-derived graph clustering · COIL image graph, k=6NCut: 0.0253 -> 0.0137Helped
Use GREEDY instead of NJWGraph clustering · COIL image graph, k=2NCut: 0.0006 -> 0.0006No clear effect
Use GREEDY instead of NJWGraph clustering · COIL image graph, k=3NCut: 0.0037 -> 0.0029Helped
Use GREEDY instead of NJWGraph clustering · COIL image graph, k=4NCut: 0.0076 -> 0.0058Helped
Use GREEDY instead of NJWGraph clustering · COIL image graph, k=6NCut: 0.0169 -> 0.0137Helped
Use QRP instead of NJWGraph clustering · COIL image graph, k=2NCut: 0.0006 -> 0.0031Hurt
Use QRP instead of NJWGraph clustering · COIL image graph, k=3NCut: 0.0037 -> 0.0059Hurt
Use QRP instead of NJWGraph clustering · COIL image graph, k=4NCut: 0.0076 -> 0.0164Hurt
Use QRP instead of NJWGraph clustering · COIL image graph, k=6NCut: 0.0169 -> 0.0253Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: COIL image dataset (graph constructed from adjacent pixels)

Benchmarks: COIL image graph clustering

Metrics: NCut visual inspection of clusters

Baselines: NJW spectral clustering QRP GREEDY

Builds on: spectral clustering (Ng, Jordan, Weiss 2001) QR factorization with column pivoting (Businger and Golub 1965) greedy column subset selection (Farahat et al. 2015)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy