atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / OOD and anomaly detection

Exploring Channel-Aware Typical Features for Out-of-Distribution Detection

AAAI 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › OOD and anomaly detection · approach: Provable and feature-based OOD detection · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes LAPS, a test-time OOD detector that replaces BATS's fixed per-channel typical-set proportion with channel-aware typical sets calibrated by channel mean and std, then computes an energy score.

Problem

Test-time out-of-distribution detection in classifiers is hurt by abnormal hidden activations, and existing typical-set methods assume a fixed proportion of typical features for every channel even though channels contribute differently.

Approach

Calibrate each channel's typical-set bounds (lambda) using the deviation of its mean and standard deviation from global statistics, rectify activations into channel-aware typical sets, and compute the energy score on the rectified features; claimed to give a better bias-variance trade-off than BATS.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace BATS fixed typical sets with channel-aware sets calibrated from mean and standard deviationEnergy OOD score with ResNet50 · ImageNet-1K ID, OOD averageFPR95: 30.16 -> 23.68Helped
replace BATS fixed typical sets with channel-aware sets calibrated from mean and standard deviationEnergy OOD score with ResNet50 · ImageNet-1K ID, OOD averageAUROC: 93.59 -> 94.78Helped
use channel-aware typical features instead of BATS fixed typical featuresEnergy OOD score with MobileNet-V2 · ImageNet-1K ID, OOD averageFPR95: 53.11 -> 34.99Helped
use channel-aware typical features instead of BATS fixed typical featuresEnergy OOD score with ResNet18 · ImageNet-1K ID, OOD averageFPR95: 41.90 -> 26.11Helped
use channel-aware typical features instead of BATS fixed typical featuresEnergy OOD score · CIFAR-100 ID, OOD averageFPR95: 65.85 -> 60.78Helped
add calibration from mean to BATS (ablation)BATS with Energy score and ResNet50 · ImageNet-1K ID, OOD averageFPR95: 30.16 -> 26.73Helped
add calibration from standard deviation to BATS (ablation)BATS with Energy score and ResNet50 · ImageNet-1K ID, OOD averageFPR95: 30.16 -> 29.33Helped
add calibration from mean to BATS + variance (ablation)BATS + variance with Energy score and ResNet50 · ImageNet-1K ID, OOD averageFPR95: 29.33 -> 23.68Helped
add calibration from standard deviation to BATS + mean (ablation)BATS + mean with Energy score and ResNet50 · ImageNet-1K ID, OOD averageFPR95: 26.73 -> 23.68Helped
vary n across 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, and 1.0 (ablation)LAPS · OOD detection benchmark in Table 5FPR95: 29.62, 29.49, 29.33, 29.43, 29.43, 29.46No clear effect
replace BATS with LAPS for the MSP scoreMSP on ImageNet-1K with ResNet50 · ImageNet-1K ID, OOD averageFPR95: 53.89 -> 44.73Helped
replace BATS with LAPS for the ODIN scoreODIN on ImageNet-1K with ResNet50 · ImageNet-1K ID, OOD averageFPR95: 38.54 -> 34.40Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-100 ImageNet-1K Textures SVHN LSUN iSUN iNaturalist SUN Places

Benchmarks: CIFAR-100 OOD benchmark (Textures, SVHN, LSUN, iSUN) ImageNet-1K OOD benchmark (iNaturalist, SUN, Places, Textures)

Metrics: FPR95 AUROC

Baselines: MSP ODIN Energy ReAct BFAct BATS

Builds on: BATS Energy score ReAct BFAct

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy