atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / OOD and anomaly detection

Test-Time Linear Out-of-Distribution Detection

CVPR 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › OOD and anomaly detection · approach: Provable and feature-based OOD detection · 12 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes RTL, a test-time linear regression that calibrates base OOD scores using the linear relation between network features and scores over a batch of test data, plus a sparse-outlier variant RTL++ and an online version.

Problem

Out-of-distribution detection with neural classifiers is unreliable because networks are overconfident on OOD inputs; existing post hoc scores are computed per sample and ignore interactions among test samples.

Approach

Observes an approximately linear relation between base OOD scores (MSP, energy, ODIN, KL) and penultimate features on benchmarks; fits a least-squares linear regression from features to scores over the test batch and uses fitted values as rectified OOD scores. RTL++ adds a LASSO-based incidental-parameter step to drop high-error samples before fitting, and an online variant updates the normal equa

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply RTL to MSP scoresMSP with Wide ResNet · CIFAR-10 OODFPR95: 51.37 -> 12.30Helped
Apply RTL to MSP scoresMSP with Wide ResNet · CIFAR-100 OODAUROC: 75.67 -> 84.50Helped
Apply RTL++ instead of RTL to MSP scores (ablation)MSP with Wide ResNet · CIFAR-100 OODFPR95: 51.63 -> 43.73Helped
Apply RTL++ instead of RTL to MSP scores (ablation)MSP with Wide ResNet · CIFAR-10 OODFPR95: 12.30 -> 13.50Hurt
Apply RTL++ to Energy scoresEnergy with Wide ResNet · CIFAR-100 OODFPR95: 73.46 -> 58.06Helped
Apply RTL to MSP scoresMSP with ResNetV2-101 · ImageNet-1k OOD averageFPR95: 76.96 -> 46.85Helped
Apply RTL++ instead of RTL to MSP scores (ablation)MSP with ResNetV2-101 · ImageNet-1k OOD averageAUROC: 86.71 -> 87.38Helped
Apply RTL++ instead of RTL to Energy scores (ablation)Energy with ResNetV2-101 · ImageNet-1k OOD averageFPR95: 57.43 -> 56.06Helped
Apply RTL++ instead of RTL to ODIN scores (ablation)ODIN with Wide ResNet · CIFAR-10 OODFPR95: 37.94 -> 35.79No clear effect
Use online RTL instead of full-test-set RTL (ablation)MSP with Wide ResNet · CIFAR-10 OODFPR95: 12.30 -> 15.06Hurt
Use online RTL instead of full-test-set RTL (ablation)MSP with Wide ResNet · CIFAR-100 OODAUROC: 84.50 -> 83.31Hurt
Increase online RTL batch size from 32 to 1024 (ablation)Online RTL with MSP · CIFAR-10 OODFPR95: 15.06 -> 14.16Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 Textures SVHN Places365 LSUN-Crop LSUN-Resize iSUN ImageNet-1k iNaturalist SUN

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 OOD suite CIFAR-100 OOD suite ImageNet-1k OOD (iNaturalist, SUN, Places, Textures)

Metrics: FPR95 AUROC

Baselines: MSP ODIN Energy KL GradNorm Isolation Forest Local Outlier Factor Gaussian Mixture Models

Builds on: maximum softmax probability ODIN energy-based OOD detection GradNorm test-time adaptation

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy