atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Exploiting Symmetric Temporally Sparse BPTT for Efficient RNN Training

AAAI 2024 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: RNN training dynamics and gradients · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes sparse BPTT for Delta RNNs that reuses forward temporal-sparsity masks in backpropagation, cutting training matrix operations by about 80% and proposing a training accelerator evaluated in RTL simulation.

Problem

Training RNNs with BPTT requires dense matrix-vector multiplications and memory accesses that are costly for online training on edge devices.

Approach

Delta RNN temporal sparsity created in the forward pass is identical in backward propagation, so gradient computation for inactivated neurons can be skipped with the same binary mask, giving mathematically identical weight updates to dense delta BPTT.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use sparse instead of dense BPTT (ablation)Delta LSTM (Θ=0.1) on GSCD · GSCD testaccuracy: 92.5 -> 92.5No clear effect
Use sparse instead of dense BPTT (ablation)Delta LSTM (Θ=0.1) on GSCD · GSCD testbackward MACs: 147.5 -> 24.5Helped
Use sparse instead of dense BPTT (ablation)Delta LSTM (Θ=0.2) on GSCD · GSCD testaccuracy: 91.0 -> 91.0No clear effect
Use sparse instead of dense BPTT (ablation)Delta GRU (Θ=0.1) on GSCD · GSCD testaccuracy: 92.7 -> 92.7No clear effect
Use sparse instead of dense BPTT (ablation)Delta GRU (Θ=0.2) on GSCD · GSCD testaccuracy: 91.6 -> 91.6No clear effect
Increase delta threshold from Θ=0.1 to Θ=0.2 (ablation)Delta LSTM · GSCD testaccuracy: 92.5 -> 91.0Hurt
Increase delta threshold from Θ=0.1 to Θ=0.2 (ablation)Delta LSTM · GSCD testbackward MACs: 24.5 -> 10.5Helped
Increase delta threshold from Θ=0.1 to Θ=0.2 (ablation)Delta GRU · GSCD testaccuracy: 92.7 -> 91.6Hurt
Use Delta LSTM instead of LSTMGSCD class-incremental, batch 32 · GSCD class-incremental, 35accuracy: 90.8 -> 90.5Hurt
Use Delta LSTM instead of LSTMGSCD class-incremental, batch 1 · GSCD class-incremental, 20+3x5MACs: 221.2 -> 44.7Helped
Use Delta LSTM instead of LSTMGSCD class-incremental, batch 1 · GSCD class-incremental, 20+3x5accuracy: 82.3 -> 80.3Hurt
Use Delta LSTM instead of LSTMGSCD class-incremental, batch 1 · GSCD class-incremental, 20+1x15accuracy: 76.6 -> 74.8Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Google Speech Commands v2 Fluent Speech Commands

Benchmarks: Google Speech Commands v2 Fluent Speech Commands

Metrics: test accuracy MxV/MAC operations sparsity DRAM write accesses RTL simulation speedup

Baselines: LSTM GRU Skip RNN Zoneout EGRU

Builds on: Delta Networks BPTT iCaRL Adam

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy