atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Numerically Accurate Hyperbolic Embeddings Using Tiling-Based Models

NeurIPS 2019 · Learning theory and algorithms › Prediction and decision losses · approach: Metric and ordinal embedding · 15 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use L-tiling model instead of Lorentz model2-dim hyperbolic embedding · MammalsMAP: 0.855±0.013 -> 0.930±0.005Helped
use L-tiling-RSGD instead of Poincare2-dim embedding · WordNet NounsMAP: 0.124±0.001 -> 0.413±0.007Helped
use RSGD instead of SGD in L-tiling model (ablation)L-tiling · MammalsMAP: 0.892±0.031 -> 0.930±0.005Helped
use L-tiling-RSGD instead of Lorentz2-dim embedding · WordNet VerbsMAP: 0.750±0.004 -> 0.746±0.004No clear effect
use group-based L-tiling instead of non-group H-tiling (ablation)2-dim tiling model · WordNet NounsMAP: 0.390±0.002 -> 0.413±0.007Helped
product of 2-dim L-tiling copies instead of single high-dim Lorentzembedding · Gr-QCMAP: 0.944±0.007 -> 0.953±0.002Mixed
store embedding in L-tiling model instead of Poincare at same sizeBio-yeast compression · Bio-yeastMAP: 0.310 -> 0.873Helped
reduce fundamental domain floats from f64 to f16 (ablation)L-tiling compression · Bio-yeastMAP: 0.873 -> 0.873No clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy