atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Representation Tradeoffs for Hyperbolic Embeddings

ICML 2018 · Learning theory and algorithms › Prediction and decision losses · approach: Metric and ordinal embedding · 190 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the combinatorial tree embeddingHyperbolic graph embeddings · WordNetMAP: 0.87* -> 0.989Helped
Use a learned scale instead of no scale (ablation)PyTorch embedding · CS PhDs, rank 50MAP: 0.481 -> 0.508Helped
Use a learned scale instead of no scale (ablation)PyTorch embedding · CS PhDs, rank 100MAP: 0.688 -> 0.681Hurt
Use a learned scale instead of no scale (ablation)PyTorch embedding · CS PhDs, rank 200MAP: 0.894 -> 0.907Helped
Apply exponential distance weighting (ablation)PyTorch embedding · CS PhDs, rank 50MAP: 0.481 -> 0.775Helped
Apply exponential distance weighting (ablation)PyTorch embedding · CS PhDs, rank 100MAP: 0.688 -> 0.882Helped
Apply exponential distance weighting (ablation)PyTorch embedding · CS PhDs, rank 200MAP: 0.894 -> 0.963Helped
Use the combinatorial construction rather than optimization-based FBHyperbolic embedding · Tree-like hierarchies, including WordNetMAP: 0.87* -> 0.989Helped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy