atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbations

NeurIPS 2019 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Robustness-accuracy trade-off analysis · 124 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
adversarially train on multiple perturbation types (max strategy) instead of a single oneCIFAR10 classifier · CIFAR10 linf+l1accuracy on union: 53.1 -> 61.1Helped
train on multiple perturbationsMNIST classifier · MNIST linflinf accuracy: 91.1 -> 71.7Hurt
train on multiple perturbationsMNIST classifier · MNIST cleanclean accuracy: 99.1 -> 97.2Hurt
use max strategy instead of avg strategy (ablation)multi-perturbation adversarial training · CIFAR10 linf+l1accuracy on union: 59.4 -> 61.1No clear effect
train with stronger linf bound 8/255 instead of 4/255 (ablation)Adv_max · CIFAR10 linf+l1accuracy on union: 61.1 -> 54.3Hurt
evaluate with affine combination of linf and RT instead of unionAdv_max · MNIST linf+RTaccuracy: 83.8 -> 62.6Hurt
evaluate with affine combination of linf and l1 instead of unionAdv_max · CIFAR10 linf+l1accuracy: 61.1 -> 58.0No clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy