atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Personalized and heterogeneous FL

GHOST: Generalizable One-Shot Federated Graph Learning with Proxy-Based Topology Knowledge Retention

ICML 2025 · Federated learning and privacy › Personalized and heterogeneous FL · approach: Federated semi-supervised and graph learning

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes GHOST, a one-shot federated graph learning framework that trains a per-client proxy generator with dual-level (feature and topology) alignment, then trains a global GNN on synthetic pseudo graphs while protecting topology-critical parameters against forgetting.

Problem

Federated graph learning under a single communication round suffers from poor generalization of the global model across diverse graph structures and catastrophic forgetting of topological knowledge under extreme structural heterogeneity.

Approach

Each client trains a proxy model that generates pseudo feature-graphs from Gaussian noise and labels, aligned to local data via a divergence, dispersion, and fused Gromov-Wasserstein loss; the server samples pseudo graphs from all proxies to train a global GNN, with a Topology-Consistency Criterion that identifies parameters important for structure and regularizes them via a knowledge retention lo

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use GHOST instead of the strongest listed baselineNode classification · Coraaccuracy: 30.98 -> 50.41Helped
Use GHOST instead of the strongest listed baselineNode classification · CiteSeeraccuracy: 35.73 -> 37.75Helped
Use GHOST instead of the strongest listed baselineNode classification · PubMedaccuracy: 57.91 -> 58.87Helped
Use GHOST instead of the strongest listed baselineNode classification · Chameleonaccuracy: 22.72 -> 25.22Helped
Use GHOST instead of the strongest listed baselineNode classification · Amazon-Photoaccuracy: 31.62 -> 37.22Helped
Use GHOST instead of the strongest listed baselineNode classification · Coauthor-CSaccuracy: 26.75 -> 29.91Helped
Use GHOST instead of the strongest listed baselineNode classification · Ogbn-Arxivaccuracy: 14.58 -> 17.24Helped
Add DLA (ablation)GHOST without DLA or TCKR · Cora, CiteSeer, Chameleon, Coauthor-CSaccuracy: 12.65 -> 46.93; 14.46 -> 36.40; 17.17 -> 25.00; 4.32 -> 27.80Helped
Add TCKR (ablation)GHOST without DLA or TCKR · Cora, CiteSeer, Chameleon, Coauthor-CSaccuracy: 12.65 -> 15.12; 14.46 -> 16.18; 17.17 -> 21.52; 4.32 -> 7.86Helped
Add TCKR when DLA is present (ablation)GHOST with DLA only · Cora, CiteSeer, Chameleon, Coauthor-CSaccuracy: 46.93 -> 50.41; 36.40 -> 37.75; 25.00 -> 25.22; 27.80 -> 29.91Helped
Add Ldiv to DLA with Ldisp (ablation)DLA with Ldisp only · Cora, CiteSeer, Chameleon, Coauthor-CSaccuracy: 27.31 -> 25.85; 16.63 -> 28.31; 20.11 -> 21.41; 12.19 -> 13.85Mixed
Add Lfgw to DLA with Ldisp and Ldiv (ablation)DLA with Ldisp and Ldiv · Cora, CiteSeer, Chameleon, Coauthor-CSaccuracy: 25.85 -> 46.93; 28.31 -> 36.40; 21.41 -> 25.00; 13.85 -> 27.80Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Cora CiteSeer PubMed Chameleon Amazon-Photo Coauthor-CS Ogbn-Arxiv

Benchmarks: Cora CiteSeer PubMed Chameleon Amazon-Photo Coauthor-CS Ogbn-Arxiv

Metrics: node classification accuracy

Baselines: FedAvg FedProx FedNova FedRCL FedPub FedTAD FedGTA DENSE FedCVAE FedSD2C

Builds on: FedAvg Elastic weight consolidation-style regularization (Zenke et al., 2017) DENSE FedCVAE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy