atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Attention and transformers

Masked Generative Nested Transformers with Decode Time Scaling

ICML 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Attention and transformers · approach: Transformer block and depth design · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MaGNeTS, which schedules nested (MatFormer-style) sub-models of increasing size over MaskGIT-style parallel decoding iterations and caches KV of unmasked tokens with intermittent refresh, cutting inference compute ~2.5-3.7x on ImageNet, UCF101, and K600.

Problem

Parallel decoding visual generators (MaskGIT-style) use the same full-size transformer at every iteration and recompute all tokens each step, which is computationally expensive at inference.

Approach

Use a decode-time model size schedule that starts with small nested sub-models and scales up to the full model over iterations, sharing parameters via MatFormer-style slicing, combined with KV caching of unmasked tokens refreshed when the model size changes; nested sub-models are trained with a ground-truth plus progressive self-distillation loss.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add caching (ablation)Baseline MaskGIT++ · ImageNet256×256FID: 2.5 -> 3.4Hurt
Add intermittent cache refresh after adding caching (ablation)Baseline MaskGIT++ · ImageNet256×256FID: 3.4 -> 2.6Helped
Add caching to the upscaling schedule (ablation)Scheduled model · ImageNet256×256FID: 3.1 -> 4.8Hurt
Add intermittent cache refresh to the scheduled model with caching (ablation)Scheduled model · ImageNet256×256FID: 4.8 -> 3.1Helped
Use an upscaling nested-model schedule instead of the baseline (ablation)MaskGIT++ · ImageNet256×256FLOP gains: 1.0 -> 2.1Helped
Replace nested models with independently trained standalone models (ablation)MaGNeTS · ImageNetFID: 3.1 -> 3.1No clear effect
Replace nested models with independently trained standalone models (ablation)MaGNeTS · UCF101FVD: 96.4 -> 115.0Hurt
Linearly transition from ground-truth loss to progressive distillation instead of using ground-truth loss only (ablation)Nested models · ImageNet256×256FID: 6.1 -> 5.7Helped
Linearly transition from ground-truth loss to progressive distillation instead of using ground-truth loss only (ablation)Nested models · UCF101FVD: 112.6 -> 96.4Helped
Train using only distillation loss (ablation)Nested models · ImageNet256×256 and UCF101training convergenceHurt
Nest along attention head count rather than head feature dimension (ablation)MaGNeTS · Image and video generationperformanceHurt
Use MaGNeTS instead of MAGVIT-LMAGVIT-L · UCF101FVD: 74.4± 2 -> 96.4±2Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet UCF101 Kinetics600

Benchmarks: ImageNet 256x256 UCF101 Kinetics600

Metrics: FID FVD Inception Score precision recall GFLOPs

Baselines: MaskGIT++ MAGVIT-B MAGVIT-L RaMViD Video Diffusion TATS Phenaki PAR-4x

Builds on: MaskGIT MatFormer MAGVIT classifier-free guidance

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy