atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Permutation-Free High-Order Interaction Tests

ICML 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Prediction-powered and conformal inference · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes permutation-free kernel tests for high-order joint independence (x̄dHSIC) and partial/complete factorisation (x̄LI, x̄SI) using V-statistics, data splitting and cross-centring, yielding N(0,1) null distributions.

Problem

Kernel-based high-order interaction tests (dHSIC, Lancaster, Streitberg) rely on costly permutation schemes to approximate null distributions, limiting scalability to many variables and large samples.

Approach

Combine data splitting, V-statistics and a novel cross-centring of kernel matrices so that normalised statistics have a standard normal limit under the null, giving a single-computation test for joint independence, Lancaster factorisation and Streitberg (complete) factorisation for any d.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use xSI+xLI instead of the other listed feature-selection methodsSynthetic feature selection · Synthetic feature selectionMSE: 4.35 vs. 5.01 (xdHSIC); 4.35 vs. 5.01 (xLI); 4.35 vs. 4.67 (Sequential: 4.69; RFE: 4.47; SHAP: 4.67; xHSIC: 4.67)Helped
Use xSI+xLI rather than permutation-based SIHigh-order interaction testing · XOR interaction, n=500computation time: 0.5 seconds vs. roughly 6 minutesHelped
Use xLI rather than permutation-based LIV-structure detection · V-structure detectioncomputation time: 0.082s vs. 7.6sHelped
Use xLI rather than permutation-based LIV-structure detection · V-structure detectionstatistical powerHurt
Use xdHSIC rather than permutation-based dHSICJoint independence testing · d=4 multivariate GaussianpowerNo clear effect
Use xSI+xLI rather than SI aloneComplete factorisation testing · Factorisation as P12 P345, d=5interaction detectionHelped
Use xdHSIC rather than dHSICCausal DAG recovery · DAG causal structural learning, d=4DAG recovery accuracy: 200-fold computational speed-upHelped
Use permutation-based methods instead of permutation-free methods in the low-sample regimeHigh-order interaction tests · n≤50 and d≤5statistical power: n≤50; d≤5; p=100Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic multivariate Gaussian XOR gate synthetic data V-structure datasets A and B (Mooij/Kernel CI benchmarks) additive noise DAG simulations S&P 500 daily returns 2020-2024

Benchmarks: synthetic MVG power curves XOR interaction power V-structure detection datasets A and B DAG structure recovery feature selection XOR+MVG dataset S&P 500 sector interactions

Metrics: statistical power type-I error runtime structural Hamming distance mean squared error percentage of significant interactions

Baselines: dHSIC LI SI x̄HSIC KCI RFE SHAP sequential feature selection

Builds on: HSIC dHSIC Lancaster interaction test Streitberg interaction test x̄HSIC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy