atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Multi-band Frequency Reconstruction for Neural Psychoacoustic Coding

ICML 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Sparse dictionary representations · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MUFFIN, a fully convolutional neural psychoacoustic codec whose multi-band spectral RVQ quantizes latent frequency bands with a modified snake activation, reaching 12.5 Hz tokens and outperforming HiFi-Codec and others on reconstruction and zero-shot TTS.

Problem

High-fidelity, perceptually preserving neural audio compression across speech, music and general sound, at low token rates, without the inefficiency of full-band RVQ and with usable tokens for speech LLMs.

Approach

Apply FFT-based frequency band splitting inside the encoder's latent space and quantize each band with successive residual codebooks (MBS-RVQ), so each codebook captures a psychoacoustically motivated band; add a bias term to the snake activation and use a HiFi-Codec-style convolutional backbone.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MBS-RVQ instead of vanilla RVQ (ablation)MUFFIN · LibriTTS test-cleanPESQ: 2.856 -> 2.996Helped
Use MBS-RVQ instead of vanilla RVQ (ablation)MUFFIN · IEMOCAPSTOI: 0.715 -> 0.806Helped
Add the bias term to the amplitude-adjusted Snake activation (ablation)MUFFIN · LibriTTS test-cleanPESQ: 2.928 -> 2.996Helped
Add amplitude and bias terms to vanilla Snake activation (ablation)MUFFIN · LibriTTS test-cleanPESQ: 2.876 -> 2.996Helped
Increase compression to 12.5 HzMUFFIN · GTZANPESQ: 1.815 -> 1.409Hurt
Use MUFFIN rather than HiFi-Codec tokensVALL-E · LibriTTS test-cleanWER (%): 32.35 -> 12.20Helped
Use MUFFIN rather than HiFi-Codec tokensVALL-E · LibriTTS test-cleanMOS: 4.00 $\pm$ 0.532 -> 4.18 $\pm$ 0.278Helped
Use MUFFIN instead of HiFi-CodecAudio reconstruction · GTZANF0CORR: 0.899 vs 0.896No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LibriTTS EARS Music4All ESC-50 VoxCeleb LibriSpeech

Benchmarks: LibriTTS test-clean LibriTTS test-other IEMOCAP GTZAN BBC sound effects LibriSpeech test-clean

Metrics: STFT distance Mel distance PESQ STOI UTMOS ViSQOL F0CORR WER MOS S-MOS

Baselines: OPUS Encodec DAC HiFi-Codec Mimi VALL-E w/ Encodec VALL-E w/ HiFi-Codec

Builds on: HiFi-Codec SoundStream EnCodec VALL-E snake activation

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy