atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Self-supervised and contrastive

FocalCodec: Low-Bitrate Speech Coding via Focal Modulation Networks

NeurIPS 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Self-supervised and contrastive · approach: Self-supervised speech and brain decoding · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces FocalCodec, a single-binary-codebook hybrid speech codec built on focal modulation and WavLM-large layer-6 features, operating at 0.16–0.65 kbps.

Problem

Low-bitrate speech tokenization that keeps both semantic and acoustic information without multi-codebook designs, distillation, or supervised fine-tuning.

Approach

A compressor-quantizer-decompressor between a frozen WavLM-large (first 6 layers) encoder and a Vocos decoder, where the compressor uses focal modulation blocks and quantization uses binary spherical quantization (BSQ) with a 2^13 implicit codebook; the codec is trained in two decoupled stages.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use FocalCodec @50 rather than BigCodecSpeech resynthesis codec · LibriSpeech test-cleandWER: 2.55 -> 2.18Helped
Use FocalCodec @50 rather than Stable CodecSpeech resynthesis codec · VoiceBankdWER: 20.32 -> 8.08Helped
Reduce FocalCodec token rate from 50 Hz to 12.5 HzFocalCodec · LibriSpeech test-cleandWER: 2.18 -> 7.94Hurt
Use FocalCodec @50 rather than BigCodecDownstream speech enhancement · Speech enhancementdWER: 26.68 -> 10.93Helped
Reduce FocalCodec token rate from 50 Hz to 25 HzFocalCodec · Text-to-speechdWER: 28.10 -> 16.75Helped
Add BSQ rather than use FSQ (ablation)FocalCodec · LibriSpeech test-cleandWER: 2.61 -> 2.54Helped
Add BSQ rather than use vanilla LFQ (ablation)FocalCodec · LibriSpeech test-cleandWER: 2.75 -> 2.54Helped
Use Snake rather than Leaky ReLU activations (ablation)FocalCodec downscaling layers · LibriSpeech test-cleandWER: 2.85 -> 2.54Helped
Use focal modulation blocks rather than Conformer blocks (ablation)FocalCodec compression block · LibriSpeech test-cleandWER: 3.58 -> 2.54Helped
Use focal modulation blocks rather than AMP blocks (ablation)FocalCodec compression block · LibriSpeech test-cleandWER: 4.52 -> 2.54Helped
Use focal modulation blocks rather than linear layers (ablation)FocalCodec compression block · LibriSpeech test-cleandWER: 9.37 -> 2.54Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LibriTTS LibriSpeech Multilingual LibriSpeech VoiceBank Libri1Mix LibriMix WHAM! VCTK IEMOCAP Libri2Mix

Benchmarks: LibriSpeech test-clean Multilingual LibriSpeech 700 VoiceBank Libri1Mix VCTK LibriSpeech ASR IEMOCAP VoiceBank SE Libri2Mix LibriSpeech TTS

Metrics: UTMOS DNSMOS dWER Sim code usage normalized entropy RTF WER ER MUSHRA

Baselines: EnCodec DAC WavLM6-KM SpeechTokenizer SemantiCodec Mimi WavTokenizer BigCodec Stable Codec TS3-Codec

Builds on: VQ-VAE focal modulation binary spherical quantization Vocos HiFi-GAN

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy