atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Conformal Tail Risk Control for Large Language Model Alignment

ICML 2025 · Large language models › Language, safety and interpretability · approach: Uncertainty quantification for LLMs · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a lightweight, training-free conformal calibration method using L-statistics to provably control distortion risk measures (CVaR, VaR) of human-rated toxicity for black-box LLM outputs.

Problem

Aligning LLM outputs so that tail risks (e.g., toxicity) measured by human ratings are controlled at a pre-specified level, when only machine disutility scores are cheap and misaligned with human ratings.

Approach

Generate nested candidate subsets filtered by a machine toxicity score, assign each subset its worst human rating, and select a single threshold via an asymptotic UCB built from L-statistics (asymptotic normality of distortion risk estimators), inverted through monotonicity to get finite-sample-style control of any distortion risk measure without model refitting.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use CDRC-L instead of CDRC-DKW or CDRC-BJConformal distortion risk control for LLM toxicity · RealToxicityPrompts held-out set, CVaR controlsampling costHelped
Use CDRC-L instead of CDRC-DKW or CDRC-BJConformal distortion risk control for LLM toxicity · RealToxicityPrompts held-out set, VaR controlsampling costHelped
Use CDRC-L instead of CDRC-DKW or CDRC-BJConformal distortion risk control for LLM toxicity · RealToxicityPrompts held-out set, CVaR and VaR controlrealized riskHelped
Use Berk-Jones confidence envelopes instead of DKW envelopesConformal distortion risk control · RealToxicityPrompts held-out set, CVaR controlsampling costHelped
Increase human-machine score alignmentCDRC-L-calibrated LLM · RealToxicityPrompts, CVaR controlsampling costHelped
Increase human-machine score alignmentCDRC-L-calibrated LLM · RealToxicityPrompts, VaR controlsampling costHelped
Finetune Detoxify on a biased subsetDetoxify toxicity scorer · Semi-synthetic toxicity scoresROC-AUC: 0.97 -> 0.86Hurt

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: RealToxicityPrompts Jigsaw Unintended Bias in Toxicity Classification

Benchmarks: RealToxicityPrompts (semi-synthetic toxicity setup)

Metrics: realized CVaR of human toxicity scores realized VaR average sampling cost

Baselines: CDRC-DKW CDRC-BJ

Builds on: conformal risk control L-statistics Berk-Jones statistics DKW inequality

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy