atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Tracking

More Than Meets the Eye: Enhancing Multi-Object Tracking Even with Prolonged Occlusions

ICML 2025 · Detection and segmentation › Tracking · approach: Association cues for online MOT

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MOTE, an end-to-end transformer MOT tracker that adds RAFT optical flow and softmax splatting features (a disocclusion matrix) into track embeddings via an enhanced track embedding module, reporting state-of-the-art results on MOT17, MOT20 and DanceTrack.

Problem

Multi-object tracking under occlusion, especially prolonged occlusions, where appearance-based and frame-by-frame detection methods lose object identity.

Approach

Integrates optical flow with deformable DETR multi-scale features via softmax splatting to form a disocclusion matrix, and fuses this splatted motion-appearance representation into track query embeddings through an enhanced track embedding module (ETEM); the loss is weighted by an IoU-based occlusion mask.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MOTE instead of BoostTrackMOT tracking · MOT17HOTA: 65.4 vs. 66.3; 2.8 pointsHelped
Use MOTE instead of ByteTrackMOT tracking · MOT17MOTA: 1.7 points (82.0 vs. 80.3)Helped
Use MOTE instead of MOTRv2*MOT tracking · DanceTrackHOTA: 74.2 vs. 73.4Helped
Use MOTE instead of MOTR without retrainingMOT tracking · SportsMOT (3 sequences, zero-shot)MOTA: 45.7% vs. 44.1%Helped
Use softmax splatting rather than linear splatting (ablation)MOTE · MOT17 (5 epochs)HOTA: 55.2 -> 58.4; 3.2-point increaseHelped
Use softmax splatting rather than linear splatting (ablation)MOTE · MOT17 (5 epochs)MOTA: 61.3 -> 64.9; 3.6-point increaseHelped
Use 15 optical-flow iterations instead of 20 (ablation)MOTE · MOT17HOTA: 58.3 -> 56.1Hurt
Use 25 optical-flow iterations instead of 20 (ablation)MOTE · MOT17HOTA: 58.3 -> 57.4Hurt
Use 25 optical-flow iterations instead of 20 (ablation)MOTE · MOT17MOTA: 63.7 -> 64.5Helped
Add occlusion weights to the loss (ablation)MOTE · MOT17HOTA: 63.5 -> 66.3; +2.8Helped
Add occlusion weights to the loss (ablation)MOTE · MOT17MOTA: 80.3 -> 82.0; +1.7Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MOT17 MOT20 DanceTrack

Benchmarks: MOT17 MOT20 DanceTrack SportsMOT MOT15

Metrics: HOTA MOTA IDF1 AssA DetA IDS FPS

Baselines: StrongSORT ByteTrack BoostTrack MOTR MOTRv2 OC-SORT QDTrack FairMOT

Builds on: MOTR deformable DETR RAFT softmax splatting MOTRv2

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy