atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Tracking

Multiple Object Tracking as ID Prediction

CVPR 2025 · Detection and segmentation › Tracking · approach: Association cues for online MOT · 61 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Reformulates multi-object tracking association as in-context ID prediction, using a Deformable DETR detector plus a learnable ID dictionary and transformer ID decoder trained end-to-end (MOTIP).

Problem

Multi-object tracking association relies on handcrafted heuristics and cost matrices; end-to-end learned association struggles with generalization to unseen trajectory IDs.

Approach

Treat association as in-context ID prediction: learnable ID embeddings are attached to historical trajectory features, and a transformer decoder predicts the ID label of current detections via cross-entropy, so random label assignment at inference keeps predictions within the training label range.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MOTIP instead of CO-MOTDanceTrack test tracking · DanceTrack testHOTA: 65.3 -> 69.6Helped
Use MOTIP instead of MeMOTRSportsMOT test tracking · SportsMOT testHOTA: 68.8 -> 72.6Helped
Use MOTIP instead of OC-SORTBFT test tracking · BFT testHOTA: 66.8 -> 70.5Helped
Add self-attention to the ID Decoder (ablation)MOTIP on DanceTrack · DanceTrackHOTA: 57.7 -> 59.7Helped
Add the Hungarian algorithm (ablation)MOTIP on DanceTrack · DanceTrackHOTA: 59.7 -> 60.8Helped
Add trajectory augmentation (ablation)MOTIP on DanceTrack · DanceTrackHOTA: 59.5 -> 62.2Helped
Use in-context ID prediction instead of ReID classification or contrastive learning (ablation)Two-stage MOT on DanceTrack · DanceTrackHOTA: 29.4; 41.0 -> 55.4Helped
Use in-context ID prediction instead of ReID formulations (ablation)One-stage MOT on DanceTrack · DanceTrackHOTA: 41.0; 49.8; 51.2; 50.6; 52.6; 54.5 -> 59.5Helped
Set trajectory random occlusion probability to 0.5 rather than 0.0 (ablation)MOTIP on DanceTrack · DanceTrackHOTA: 59.5 -> 60.7Helped
Set trajectory random occlusion probability to 1.0 rather than 0.5 (ablation)MOTIP on DanceTrack · DanceTrackHOTA: 60.7 -> 58.6Hurt
Set trajectory random switch probability to 0.2 rather than 0.0, with λocc=0.5 (ablation)MOTIP on DanceTrack · DanceTrackHOTA: 60.7 -> 61.6Helped
Set trajectory random switch probability to 0.5 rather than 0.2, with λocc=0.5 (ablation)MOTIP on DanceTrack · DanceTrackHOTA: 61.6 -> 62.2Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DanceTrack SportsMOT BFT COCO

Benchmarks: DanceTrack SportsMOT BFT

Metrics: HOTA DetA AssA MOTA IDF1

Baselines: FairMOT ByteTrack OC-SORT MeMOTR CO-MOT MOTRv2 MOTRv3 QDTrack Hybrid-SORT DiffMOT

Builds on: Deformable DETR MOTR MeMOTR Transformer decoder

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy