atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Feature-Mapping Topology Optimization with Neural Heaviside Signed Distance Functions

ICML 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Generative latent models for single-cell data

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Neural Heaviside SDFs: a VAE-style network that approximates the Heaviside of feature SDFs in a shared latent space, used as a differentiable decoder for feature-mapping topology optimization of ellipses, triangles and quadrangles.

Problem

Feature-mapping topology optimization is limited by the small set of geometric features, their fixed parameterizations, and the need for differentiable SDFs, which leads to manufacturing-friendly but restricted designs.

Approach

Train an encoder and Heaviside decoder (DeepSDF-style) to map a one-hot shape code of several feature types into a unified latent space, then optimize latent codes with adjoint gradients against compliance, with a refactoring step to keep latents feasible.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use Neural Heaviside SDF instead of Ellipses FMTOFMTO topology optimization · Task 1compliance: 4.39 (0.297) -> 3.91 (0.255)Helped
use Neural Heaviside SDF instead of Ellipses FMTOFMTO topology optimization · Task 2compliance: 2.22 (0.368) -> 1.98 (0.354)Helped
use Neural Heaviside SDF instead of Ellipses FMTOFMTO topology optimization · Task 3compliance: 1.74 (0.449) -> 1.63 (0.437)Helped
use Neural Heaviside SDF instead of Ellipses FMTOFMTO topology optimization · Task 4compliance: 1.55 (0.345) -> 1.52 (0.337)Helped
use Neural Heaviside SDF instead of TreeTOpFMTO topology optimization · Task 5compliance: 1.57 (0.449) -> 1.55 (0.409)Helped
use Neural Heaviside SDF instead of TreeTOpFMTO topology optimization · Task 6compliance: 3.09 (0.439) -> 2.34 (0.401)Helped
replace DeepSDF decoder with symmetric decoder (ablation)VAE Heaviside SDF approximator · Neural Heaviside SDF test datasetMSEHv: 0.000277 ± 1.07e-05 -> 0.00128 ± 0.000201Hurt
replace DeepSDF decoder with symmetric decoder (ablation)VAE Heaviside SDF approximator · Neural Heaviside SDF test datasetSmoothness: 0.00575 ± 7.11e-05 -> 0.0163 ± 0.000574Hurt
train the latent representation via Reconstruction decoder instead of Heaviside decoder (ablation)VAE with DeepSDF decoder · Neural Heaviside SDF test datasetMSEHv: 0.000277 ± 1.07e-05 -> 0.000475 ± 3.51e-05Hurt
train the latent representation via Reconstruction decoder instead of Heaviside decoder (ablation)VAE with DeepSDF decoder · Neural Heaviside SDF test datasetMSEχ: 0.000202 ± 2.82e-05 -> 7.42e-05 ± 1.09e-05Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetically generated geometric feature shape codes (ellipses, triangles, quadrangles) with Heaviside values

Benchmarks: six classical topology optimization tasks (Tasks 1-6)

Metrics: compliance volume fraction MSE of Heaviside MSE of shape code smoothness (gradient norm of Heaviside error)

Baselines: SIMP NTopo TopoDiff TreeTOp Ellipses FMTO (Kumar & Saxena, 2022)

Builds on: DeepSDF SIMP TreeTOp variational autoencoder

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy