atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Sample complexity

Optimal bounds for $\ell_p$ sensitivity sampling via $\ell_2$ augmentation

ICML 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Sample complexity · approach: Learning under log-concave distributions · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that pure ℓp sensitivity sampling needs Ω(d^{2-p/2}) samples for ℓp subspace embeddings, and that augmenting ℓp sensitivities with ℓ2 sensitivities and uniform weights yields optimal Õ(ε^-2 d) sampling for p in [1,2], extended to logistic regression with Õ(ε^-2 μ d).

Problem

Sensitivity sampling for ℓp subspace embeddings (p in [1,2]) and logistic regression typically needs more samples than the optimal linear dependence on d; it was open whether ℓp sensitivity sampling can reach Õ(ε^-2(S+d)).

Approach

Augment ℓp sensitivity sampling probabilities with ℓ2 leverage scores and a uniform 1/n term, and keep sampling weights separate (not folded into the data) so that ℓ2 and ℓp subspace embedding guarantees hold simultaneously; generalize the chaining/Gaussian process analysis to weighted norms; use a p-ReLU decomposition of the logistic loss to obtain μd dependence.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
augment ℓp sensitivities with ℓ2 sensitivities and a uniform termℓp sensitivity sampling · ℓp subspace embeddings, p ∈ [1,2]sample complexity: \tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}(\mathfrak S^{(p)} + d)) vs. \tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}\mathfrak S^{2/p})Helped
augment ℓ1 sensitivities with ℓ2 sensitivities and a uniform termSensitivity sampling for logistic regression · Logistic regressionsample complexity: \tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}\mu d) vs. \tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}\mu^2 d)Helped
sample according to pure ℓp leverage scores rather than augmenting them with ℓ2 sensitivitiesℓp sensitivity sampling · ℓp subspace embeddings, p ∈ [1,2]sample complexity lower bound: \tilde\Omega(d^{2-p/2})Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: sample size complexity (theoretical) relative approximation error

Baselines: plain sensitivity sampling Lewis weight sampling Mutually-augmented sensitivity bound of prior work (S^{2/p}) Sd^{1-p/2} sensitivity bound previous logistic regression Lewis weight bound O(μ^2 d)

Builds on: sensitivity sampling Lewis weights Dudley chaining bound Dual Sudakov minoration

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy