atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Adaptive Hierarchical Certification for Segmentation using Randomized Smoothing

ICML 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Confidence calibration objectives · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes AdaptiveCertify, which certifies segmentation pixels at adaptively chosen coarser levels of a class hierarchy instead of abstaining, and a Certified Information Gain metric to evaluate it.

Problem

Randomized-smoothing certification for semantic segmentation over a flat set of fine-grained classes yields high abstain rates because the model fluctuates among many classes at unstable pixels.

Approach

Use a class hierarchy DAG and assign each pixel a hierarchy level based on the posterior gap between its top two classes (estimated from independent samples); unstable pixels are certified at a coarser parent label via adaptive sampling over the flat model treated as a black box, with Bonferroni-corrected binomial tests. A new CIG metric weights certified labels by their granularity.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use adaptive hierarchical certification instead of flat SegCertifyHrNetV2 segmentation certification · Cityscapes (n=100, τ=0.75, σ=0.25)CIG: 0.89 -> 0.90Helped
Use adaptive hierarchical certification instead of flat SegCertifyHrNetV2 segmentation certification · Cityscapes (n=100, τ=0.75, σ=0.25)abstain rate (%): 7 -> 5Helped
Use adaptive hierarchical certification instead of flat SegCertifyHrNetV2 segmentation certification · ACDC (n=100, τ=0.75, σ=0.25)CIG: 0.67 -> 0.68Helped
Use adaptive hierarchical certification instead of flat SegCertifyHrNetV2 segmentation certification · ACDC (n=100, τ=0.75, σ=0.25)abstain rate (%): 21 -> 16Helped
Use adaptive hierarchical certification instead of flat SegCertifyHrNetV2 segmentation certification · PASCAL-Context (n=100, τ=0.75, σ=0.25)CIG: 0.57 -> 0.58Helped
Use adaptive hierarchical certification instead of flat SegCertifyHrNetV2 segmentation certification · PASCAL-Context (n=100, τ=0.75, σ=0.25)abstain rate (%): 20 -> 16Helped
Use adaptive hierarchical certification instead of flat SegCertifyHrNetV2 segmentation certification · COCO-Stuff-10K (n=100, τ=0.75, σ=0.25)CIG: 0.58 -> 0.60Helped
Use adaptive hierarchical certification instead of flat SegCertifyHrNetV2 segmentation certification · COCO-Stuff-10K (n=100, τ=0.75, σ=0.25)abstain rate (%): 20 -> 13Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Cityscapes ACDC PASCAL-Context COCO-Stuff-10K

Benchmarks: Cityscapes ACDC PASCAL-Context COCO-Stuff-10K

Metrics: Certified Information Gain (CIG) class-average CIG (cCIG) % abstain class-average % abstain mIoU

Baselines: SegCertify Uncertified HrNet

Builds on: SegCertify randomized smoothing Bonferroni correction

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy